Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444620›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2019

A phase Ib study of the combination regorafenib with PF-03446962 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (REGAL-1 trial).

Jeffrey Melson Clarke, Gerard C Blobe, John H Strickler, Hope Elizabeth Uronis, S Yousuf Zafar, Michael Morse, Evan Dropkin, Leigh Howard, Margot O'Neill, Christel N Rushing and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Targeted Treatment against Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey Melson ClarkeDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. jeffrey.clarke@duke.edu.
Gerard C BlobeDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
John H StricklerDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Hope Elizabeth UronisDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
S Yousuf ZafarDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Michael MorseDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Evan DropkinDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Leigh HowardDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Margot O'NeillDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Christel N RushingDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Donna NiedzwieckiDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Hollie WatsonDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Emily BolchDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Christy ArrowoodDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Yingmiao LiuDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Andrew B NixonDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Medicine Circle, Morris Building, Rm 25178, DUMC Box 3198, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Herbert I HurwitzGenentech, Inc, San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Fish · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RPTD), as well as the safety and tolerability of PF-03446962, a monoclonal antibody targeting activin receptor like kinase 1 (ALK-1), in combination with regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

methodsThe first stage of this study was a standard "3 + 3" open-label dose-escalation scheme. Cohorts of 3-6 subjects were started with 120 mg of regorafenib given PO daily for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle, plus 4.5 mg/kg of PF-03446962 given IV every 2 weeks. Doses of both drugs were adjusted according to dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Plasma was collected for multiplexed ELISA analysis of factors related to tumor growth and angiogenesis.

resultsSeventeen subjects were enrolled, of whom 11 were deemed evaluable. Seven subjects were enrolled at dose level 1, and four were enrolled at level - 1. Overall, three DLTs were observed during the dose-escalation phase: two in level 1 and one in level - 1. A planned dose-expansion cohort was not started due to early termination of the clinical trial. Common adverse events were infusion-related reaction, fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, abdominal pain, dehydration, nausea, back pain, anorexia, and diarrhea. One subject achieved stable disease for 5.5 months, but discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

conclusionsThe regimen of regorafenib and PF-03446962 was associated with unacceptable toxicity and did not demonstrate notable clinical activity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedColorectal NeoplasmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesActivin Receptors, Type IIAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedActivin Receptors, Type IIACVRL1 protein, humanAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedascrinvacumabEnzyme InhibitorsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesregorafenibALK-1Colorectal cancerPF-03446962Phase IbRegorafenib

Identifiers

PMID31444620
PMCPMC6769092
OpenAlexW2969718979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.