Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444561›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based posturography.

Ariadna Valldeperes, Xabier Altuna, Zuriñe Martinez-Basterra, Marcos Rossi-Izquierdo, Jesus Benitez-Rosario, Nicolas Perez-Fernandez, Jorge Rey-Martinez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ariadna ValldeperesNeurolotlogy Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain.
Xabier AltunaNeurolotlogy Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-5017
Zuriñe Martinez-BasterraNeurolotlogy Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain.
Marcos Rossi-IzquierdoOtorhinolaryngology Unit, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Jesus Benitez-RosarioENT Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Nicolas Perez-FernandezENT Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1192-5901
Jorge Rey-MartinezNeurolotlogy Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain. bendermh@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-3823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassical posturography techniques have been recently enhanced by the use of different motion tracking devices, but for technical reasons they are not used to track directly the body spatial position of a subject.

objectiveTo describe and clinically evaluate a wireless inertial measurement unit-based mobile system to track body position changes.

methodsThe developed system used a calculus transformation method using the acceleration data corrected by Kalman and Butterworth filters to output position data. A prospective non-randomized clinical study involving 15 healthy subjects was performed to evaluate the agreement between the confidence ellipse areas synchronously measured by the new developed system and a classical posturography system while performing a modified clinical test of sensory interaction in balance.

resultsThe overall intra-class correlation index was 0.93 (CI 0.89, 0.96). Grouped by conditions, under conditions 1-4, Pearson's correlation was 0.604, 0.78, 0.882, and 0.81, respectively.

conclusionThe developed wireless inertial measurement unit-based posturography system was valid for tracking the sway variances in normal subjects under habitual clinical testing conditions. Further studies are needed to validate this system on patients and also under other posture conditions.

Indexed as

ActigraphyMovementPostural BalancePostureAccelerationAccelerometryAdultFemaleHumansMaleMaterials TestingProspective StudiesWireless TechnologyAccelerometerBody position trackingCEAIMUPosturography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.