Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444542›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2019

Comparison of crevicular fluid cytokine levels after the application of surface sealants : A randomized trial.

Sinan Şen, Gül Orhan, Sebastian Zingler, Eleni Katsikogianni, Christopher J Lux, Ralf Erber

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sinan ŞenDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. sinan.sen@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-5398
Gül OrhanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian ZinglerDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eleni KatsikogianniDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christopher J LuxDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ralf ErberDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurface sealants are widely used in orthodontic practice to avoid enamel decalcifications in patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances. While their clinical benefit was tested in several studies, their biocompatibility has been evaluated to a lesser extent. Therefore, the aim of this randomized prospective study was to evaluate possible adverse biological effects of three commonly used surface sealants and a bonding primer on gingival tissues by analysing cytokines in crevicular fluid of orthodontic patients after the application of surface sealants.

methodsA single centre parallel trial was conducted. Using a split-mouth design quadrants of 15 patients requiring orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances were randomized to one of three commonly used surface sealants (Pro Seal®, Opal®Seal™, Protecto®CaF2Nano) and a bonding primer (Transbond™ XT). Interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-10 levels in crevicular fluids of the individual quadrants were assessed at four different time points (before application, and at 30, 60 and 90 min after application).

resultsIn all, 60 quadrants of 15 patients were randomized (Pro Seal® n = 15, Opal®Seal™ n = 15, Protecto®CaF2Nano n = 15, Transbond™ XT n = 15) and analysed. No significant changes for IL-8 or IL-10 levels in crevicular fluid after the application of surface sealants or bonding primer were detected. However, interpatient variability was high. No further clinical side effects were detected.

conclusionsCommonly used pre-bonding surface sealants (Pro Seal®, Opal®Seal™) do not appear to have a significant impact on inflammatory cytokines levels of crevicular fluid and do not appear to contribute to sensitization or hypersensitivity events.

Indexed as

CytokinesDental EnamelHumansProspective StudiesCytokinesBiocompatibilityDemineralisationInflammatory cytokinesOrthodontic treatmentSensitizationSurface sealants

Identifiers

PMID31444542
OpenAlexW2969387048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.