Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444339›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Bacteria evoke alarm behaviour in zebrafish.

Joanne Shu Ming Chia, Elena S Wall, Caroline Lei Wee, Thomas A J Rowland, Ruey-Kuang Cheng, Kathleen Cheow, Karen Guillemin, Suresh Jesuthasan

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epidermal Club Cells in Fishes: A Case for Ecoimmunological Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Joanne Shu Ming ChiaLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4765-4813
Elena S WallInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Caroline Lei WeeInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4599-550X
Thomas A J RowlandLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-0181
Ruey-Kuang ChengLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Kathleen CheowLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-2284
Karen GuilleminInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-9955
Suresh JesuthasanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. sureshj@ntu.edu.sg.
Nanyang Technological University · SGCanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SGUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Live Imaging CoreP01GM125576 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BOHANNAN, BRENDAN, EISEN, JUDITH S · 2018 to 2022
$7.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM125576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When injured, fish release an alarm substance (Schreckstoff) that elicits fear in members of their shoal. Although Schreckstoff has been proposed to be produced by club cells in the skin, several observations indicate that these giant cells function primarily in immunity. Previous data indicate that the alarm substance can be isolated from mucus. Here we show that mucus, as well as bacteria, are transported from the external surface into club cells, by cytoplasmic transfer or invasion of cells, including neutrophils. The presence of bacteria inside club cells raises the possibility that the alarm substance may contain a bacterial component. Indeed, lysate from a zebrafish Staphylococcus isolate is sufficient to elicit alarm behaviour, acting in concert with a substance from fish. These results suggest that Schreckstoff, which allows one individual to unwittingly change the emotional state of the surrounding population, derives from two kingdoms and is associated with processes that protect the host from bacteria.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedFearGiant CellsIntravital MicroscopyMucusNeutrophilsOptical ImagingReflex, StartleSkinStaphylococcusSymbiosisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31444339
PMCPMC6707203
OpenAlexW2969363028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.