Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444323›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Integration of cortical population signals for visual perception.

Ariana R Andrei, Sorin Pojoga, Roger Janz, Valentin Dragoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Brain state limits propagation of neural signals in laminar cortical circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ariana R AndreiDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-2580
Sorin PojogaDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5991-6027
Roger JanzDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Valentin DragoiDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. valentin.dragoi@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0926

Funding

Anion channelrhodopsin-based viral tools to manipulate brain networks in behaving animalsU01MH109146 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DRAGOI, VALENTIN, JANZ, ROGER · 2015 to 2017
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual stimuli evoke heterogeneous responses across nearby neural populations. These signals must be locally integrated to contribute to perception, but the principles underlying this process are unknown. Here, we exploit the systematic organization of orientation preference in macaque primary visual cortex (V1) and perform causal manipulations to examine the limits of signal integration. Optogenetic stimulation and visual stimuli are used to simultaneously drive two neural populations with overlapping receptive fields. We report that optogenetic stimulation raises firing rates uniformly across conditions, but improves the detection of visual stimuli only when activating cells that are preferentially-tuned to the visual stimulus. Further, we show that changes in correlated variability are exclusively present when the optogenetically and visually-activated populations are functionally-proximal, suggesting that correlation changes represent a hallmark of signal integration. Our results demonstrate that information from functionally-proximal neurons is pooled for perception, but functionally-distal signals remain independent.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBehavior Observation TechniquesBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, VisualMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsOptogeneticsOrientationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID31444323
PMCPMC6707195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.