Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444186›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Optimising neonatal service provision for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England (OPTI-PREM), using national data, qualitative research and economic analysis: a study protocol.

Thillagavathie Pillay, Neena Modi, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Brad Manktelow, Sarah E Seaton, Natalie Armstrong, Elizabeth S Draper, Kelvin Dawson, Alexis Paton, Abdul Qader Tahir Ismail and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02994849 completednot on this map

OPTI-Prem: Optimising Neonatal Service Provision for Preterm Babies Born Between 27 and 31 Weeks of Gestation in England Using National Data, Qualitative Research and Economic Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustRan2017 to 2022Enrolled4,364ConditionsNeonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
NCT05326191 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

First-trimester Placental Ultrasound Study (First PLUS): an Observational Cohort Study to Assess the Clinical Utility of the OxNNet Toolkit for the Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

TypeobservationalSponsorPerspectumRan2022 to 2023Enrolled4,000ConditionsFetal Growth Complications, Pregnancy ComplicationsArmsUltrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Parenting through place-of-care disruptions: A qualitative study of parents' experiences of neonatal care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thillagavathie PillayRoyal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK tilly.pillay@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-3282
Neena ModiDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Oliver Rivero-AriasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brad ManktelowDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sarah E SeatonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Natalie ArmstrongDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Elizabeth S DraperDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kelvin DawsonParent Representative, BLISS National Charity for Babies Born Premature or Sick, London, UK.
Alexis PatonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Abdul Qader Tahir IsmailRoyal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-8684
Miaoqing YangNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elaine M BoyleDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/15/70/104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn England, for babies born at 23-26 weeks gestation, care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) as opposed to a local neonatal unit (LNU) improves survival to discharge. This evidence is shaping neonatal health services. In contrast, there is no evidence to guide location of care for the next most vulnerable group (born at 27-31 weeks gestation) whose care is currently spread between 45 NICU and 84 LNU in England. This group represents 12% of preterm births in England and over onr-third of all neonatal unit care days. Compared with those born at 23-26 weeks gestation, they account for four times more admissions and twice as many National Health Service bed days/year.

methodsIn this mixed-methods study, our primary objective is to assess, for babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation and admitted to a neonatal unit in England, whether care in an NICU vs an LNU impacts on survival and key morbidities (up to age 1 year), at each gestational age in weeks. Routinely recorded data extracted from real-time, point-of-care patient management systems held in the National Neonatal Research Database, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics, for January 2014 to December 2018, will be analysed. Secondary objectives are to assess (1) whether differences in care provided, rather than a focus on LNU/NICU designation, drives gestation-specific outcomes, (2) where care is most cost-effective and (3) what parents' and clinicians' perspectives are on place of care, and how these could guide clinical decision-making. Our findings will be used to develop recommendations, in collaboration with national bodies, to inform clinical practice, commissioning and policy-making. The project is supported by a parent advisory panel and a study steering committee. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been obtained (IRAS 212304). Dissemination will be through publication of findings and development of recommendations for care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureResearch DesignEnglandGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalQualitative ResearchSurvival Analysishealth economicsneonatal intensive & critical careneonatologyorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID31444186
PMCPMC6707683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.