Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444179›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Efficacy of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a protocol for systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Makoto Saito, Rashid Mansoor, Kalynn Kennon, Rose McGready, François Nosten, Philippe J Guérin, Kasia Stepniewska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Makoto SaitoWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK makoto.saito@wwarn.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-9287
Rashid MansoorWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3011-4952
Kalynn KennonWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK.
Rose McGreadyCentre for Tropical Disease and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
François NostenCentre for Tropical Disease and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philippe J GuérinWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK.
Kasia StepniewskaWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBMahidol University · TH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnant women are more vulnerable to malaria leading to adverse impact on both mothers and fetuses. However, knowledge on the efficacy and safety of antimalarials in pregnancy is limited by the paucity of randomised control trials and the lack of standardised protocols in this special subpopulation. Pooling individual patient data (IPD) for meta-analysis could address in part these limitations to summarise accurately the currently available evidence on treatment efficacy and risk factors for treatment failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To assess the treatment efficacy of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy, seven databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde) and two clinical trial registries (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrial.gov) were searched. Both interventional and observational cohort studies following up for at least 28 days will be included. IPD of the identified eligible published or unpublished studies will be sought by inviting principal investigators. Raw IPD will be shared through the web-based secure platform developed by the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network using the established methodology. The primary objective is to compare the risk of PCR-corrected treatment failure among different treatments and to find the risk factors. One-stage IPD meta-analysis by Cox model with shared frailty will be conducted. A risk of bias assessment will be conducted to address the impact of unshared potential data and of the quality of individual studies. Potential limitations include difficulty in acquiring the IPD and heterogeneity of the study designs due to the lack of standard. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This IPD meta-analysis consists of secondary analyses of existing anonymous data and meets the criteria for waiver of ethics review by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee. The results of this IPD meta-analysis will be disseminated through open-access publications at peer-reviewed journals. The study results will lead to a better understanding of malaria treatment in pregnancy, which can be used for clinical decision-making and conducting further studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018104013.

Indexed as

ArtemisininsMalaria, FalciparumPregnancy Complications, InfectiousQuinineRecordsAntimalarialsFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisininsQuinineartemisininindividual patient data meta-analysismalariapregnancyquininetreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31444179
PMCPMC6707703
OpenAlexW2969928654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.