Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443635›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Trends in resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter species in hospitalized patients in the United States: 2013-2017.

Vikas Gupta, Gang Ye, Melanie Olesky, Kenneth Lawrence, John Murray, Kalvin Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Burden and Economic Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance inThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Determinants ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence and Trends of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vikas GuptaBecton, Dickinson and Company, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA. vikas.gupta@bd.com.
Gang YeBecton, Dickinson and Company, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Melanie OleskyTetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA.
Kenneth LawrenceTetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA.
John MurrayBecton, Dickinson and Company, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Kalvin YuBecton, Dickinson and Company, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Becton Dickinson (United States) · USTetraphase Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Becton, Dickinson and Company Not applicableTetraphase Pharmaceuticals Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrends in antimicrobial resistance help inform infection control efforts. We examined trends in resistance for Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. from 2013 to 2017 in hospitalized US patients.

methodsWe analyzed antimicrobial susceptibility of non-duplicate isolates in hospitalized patients (not limited to hospital-acquired infections) in the US BD Insights Research Database. Resistance profiles of interest were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, multidrug resistant (MDR), and carbapenem-nonsusceptible (Carb-NS) phenotypes of Enterobacteriaceae, and MDR and Carb-NS Acinetobacter spp. Time series models were used to evaluate the patterns of resistance trends in rate per 100 hospital admissions and proportion per isolates tested.

resultsMore than 1 million Enterobacteriaceae isolates were obtained from 411 hospitals; 12.05% were ESBL, 1.21% Carb-NS, and 7.08% MDR. Urine was the most common source. For Acinetobacter spp. (n = 19,325), 37.48% were Carb-NS, 47.66% were MDR, and the most common source was skin/wound cultures. Trend analyses showed that the rates of ESBL and Carb-NS Enterobacteriaceae per 100 hospital admissions increased significantly between 2013 and 2017. Rates of MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Carb-NS and MDR Acinetobacter spp. decreased during this time period. Trends in proportions of resistant isolates generally mirrored trends in rates per 100 hospital admissions. MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Carb-NS and MDR Acinetobacter spp. were more common in winter than summer.

conclusionsIn this large-scale study of patients in US hospitals, rates of ESBL and Carb-NS Enterobacteriaceae per 100 hospital admissions increased between 2013 and 2017. MDR Enterobacteriaceae and MDR and Carb-NS Acinetobacter spp. isolates decreased over this period. These data support continuing infection control and stewardship efforts and the development of new therapeutic options.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHospitalsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsAcinetobacterAntimicrobial resistanceCarbapenemsEnterobacteriaceaeExtended-spectrum beta-lactamasesMultidrug resistanceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31443635
PMCPMC6708167
OpenAlexW2969863102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.