Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443629›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2019

Identifying and managing refractory migraine: barriers and opportunities?

Linda D'Antona, Manjit Matharu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Algorithm-based approach to headache.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Screening for Copy Number Variations of the 15q13.3 Hotspot inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Approach to Pediatric Intractable Migraine.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda D'AntonaHeadache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Manjit MatharuHeadache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. m.matharu@uclmail.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term refractory migraine has been used to describe persistent headache that is difficult to treat or fails to respond to standard and/or aggressive treatments. This subgroup of migraine patients are generally highly disabled and experience impaired quality of life, despite optimal treatments. Several definitions and criteria for refractory migraine have been published, but as yet, an accepted or established definition is not available. This article reviews the published criteria and proposes a new set of criteria. The epidemiology, pathophysiology and management options are also reviewed.

Indexed as

HumansMigraine DisordersQuality of LifeAbortiveComorbiditiesDisabilityMedication overuseMigrainePreventiveRefractory

Identifiers

PMID31443629
PMCPMC6734232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.