ReviewMicroorganisms2019
Review in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altered expression of miRNAs and its implication for Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Structural and functional insights into Pseudomonas aeruginosa's secretion systems 1-6: regulation, role in microbial keratitis and drug targets.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Retrospective analysis of secreted PrpL protease activity in clinical isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from corneal ulcers and healthy eyes of canines in Ibagué-Tolima, Colombia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Unraveling the immunosuppressive role of Elastase B produced by cystic fibrosis isolates ofVirulence · 2025Article
- Temperature controls LasR regulation ofmBio · 2025Article
- Stable topical application of antimicrobials using plumbing rings in an ex vivo porcine corneal infection model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Polymicrobial interactions betweenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Exploring roles of the chitinase ChiC in modulatingMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Assays for Studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa Secreted Proteases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Management of virulence inRSC advances · 2023Article
- Ocular Bacterial Infections: A Ten-Year Survey and Review of Causative Organisms Based on the Oklahoma Experience.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Thymosin beta 4: A potential novel adjunct treatment for bacterial keratitis.International immunopharmacology · 2023Article
- A rise in the frequency ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Antibacterial effects of octadecyl trimethylammonium micelle-clay complex against bacterial eye pathogens: potential as a contact lens disinfectant.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Virulence Factors ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Anti-PeerJ · 2022Article
- Adsorption of extracellular proteases and pyocyanin produced byCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2022Article
- Pivotal Role of Corneal Fibroblasts in Progression to Corneal Ulcer in Bacterial Keratitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Genipin Delays Corneal Stromal Enzymatic Digestion.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.