Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443381›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Underlying Differences in Health Spending Within the World Health Organisation Europe Region-Comparing EU15, EU Post-2004, CIS, EU Candidate, and CARINFONET Countries.

Mihajlo Jakovljevic, Paula Odete Fernandes, João Paulo Teixeira, Nemanja Rancic, Yuriy Timofeyev, Vladimir Reshetnikov

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health technology assessment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: an updated SWOT analysis.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost awareness among intensivists in their daily clinical practice: a prospective multicentre study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analysis of Healthcare Expenditures in Bulgaria.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mihajlo JakovljevicDepartment of Global Health Economics and Policy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. sidartagothama@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9160-6846
Paula Odete FernandesUNIAG, The Management Applied Research Unit Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-4901
João Paulo TeixeiraCEDRI, Research Center in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics UNIAG, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-5702
Nemanja RancicFaculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-5122-8094
Yuriy TimofeyevFaculty of Business and Management, National Research University Higher Schools of Economics, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-8495
Vladimir ReshetnikovDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare, First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Polytechnic Institute of Bragança · PTNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUSechenov University · RUUniversity of Defence · RSUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the differences in health spending within the World Health Organization (WHO) Europe region by comparing the EU15, the EU post-2004, CIS, EU Candidate and CARINFONET countries. The WHO European Region (53 countries) has been divided into the following sub-groups: EU15, EU post-2004, CIS, EU Candidate countries and CARINFONET countries. The study period, based on the availability of WHO Global Health expenditure data, was 1995 to 2014. EU15 countries have exhibited the strongest growth in total health spending both in nominal and purchasing power parity terms. The dynamics of CIS members' private sector expenditure growth as a percentage of GDP change has exceeded that of other groups. Private sector expenditure on health as a percentage of total government expenditure, has steadily the highest percentage point share among CARINFONET countries. Furthermore, private households' out-of-pocket payments on health as a percentage of total health expenditure, has been dominated by Central Asian republics for most of the period, although, for the period 2010 to 2014, the latter have tended to converge with those of CIS countries. Western EU15 nations have shown a serious growth of health expenditure far exceeding their pace of real economic growth in the long run. There is concerning growth of private health spending among the CIS and CARINFONET nations. It reflects growing citizen vulnerability in terms of questionable affordability of healthcare. Health care investment capability has grown most substantially in the Russian Federation, Turkey and Poland being the classical examples of emerging markets.

Indexed as

EuropeHealth ExpendituresPublic HealthWorld Health OrganizationEuropehealth economicsprivate health expenditurepublic health expenditureWHO

Identifiers

PMID31443381
PMCPMC6747367
OpenAlexW2969344998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.