Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443347›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers for Estimating VO

Stefanie Passler, Julian Bohrer, Lukas Blöchinger, Veit Senner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Validity of V̇OEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Photoplethysmography-new applications for an old technology: a sleep technology review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Wearable activity trackers-advanced technology or advanced marketing?European journal of applied physiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefanie PasslerProfessorship of Sport Equipment and Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, D-85747 Garching, Germany. stefanie.passler@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-6700
Julian BohrerProfessorship of Sport Equipment and Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
Lukas BlöchingerProfessorship of Sport Equipment and Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
Veit SennerProfessorship of Sport Equipment and Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, D-85747 Garching, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity trackers are a simple and mostly low-priced method to capture physiological parameters. Despite the high number of wrist-worn devices, there is a lack of scientific validation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the activity trackers represent a valid alternative to gold-standard methods in terms of estimating energy expenditure (EE) and maximum oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismOxygen ConsumptionAdultFemaleFitness TrackersGermanyHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsWristYoung Adultaccuracyconsumer wearable devicesfitness trackersmonitoringphysical activitysports watchesvalidation

Identifiers

PMID31443347
PMCPMC6747132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.