Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443193›Full record

ArticleToxins2019

Bacteriocin Occurrence and Activity in

Andrew Cameron, Rahat Zaheer, Emelia H Adator, Ruth Barbieri, Tim Reuter, Tim A McAllister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacteriocin-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Colicins and Microcins Produced byInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Bacteriocin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Comparative genomics analysis of Pediococcus acidilactici species.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
  17. Microbial genomics · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Veterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew CameronFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
Rahat ZaheerLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3307-4666
Emelia H AdatorDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Ruth BarbieriLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
Tim ReuterAlberta Agriculture and Forestry, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-3163
Tim A McAllisterLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada. tim.mcallister@canada.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8266-6513
Lethbridge Research and Development CentreUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR)

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriocinsCattleEscherichia coliFecesGenes, BacterialWastewaterWhole Genome SequencingBacteriocinsWastewaterantimicrobial peptideantimicrobial resistancebacteriocincattlecolicinEscherichia colimicrocinSTECwastewater

Identifiers

PMID31443193
PMCPMC6723558
OpenAlexW2966918884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.