ArticleNutrients2019
Relationship between Nutrition Intake and 28-Day Mortality Using Modified NUTRIC Score in Patients with Sepsis.
Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of nutritional support on mortality among critically ill patients with different nutritional risks: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Phase-dependent intake and 90-day mortality by nutrition status in invasive mechanical ventilation critically ill adults: A retrospective cohort study.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Comparative Prognostic Accuracy of Objective Nutritional Indices in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Nutritional Risk and 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality in Adults With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, nutritional status, and inflammatory markers in sepsis patients with and without sarcopenia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and sepsis: mechanisms, clinical correlations, and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Association of modified NUTRIC score for nutritional risk and in-hospital developed malnutrition in adults with severe injuries: a prospective observational cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Observational
- Early Adequate Nutrition in ICU Is Associated with Survival Gain : Retrospective Cohort Study in Patient with Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- An Observational Study of Nutritional Assessment, Prescription, Practices, and Its Outcome among Critically Ill Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Association between alkaline phosphatase to albumin ratio and mortality among patients with sepsis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The NUTRIC Score as a Tool to Predict Mortality and Increased Resource Utilization in Intensive Care Patients with Sepsis.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Association between early nutrition support and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients: the FRANS prospective nutrition cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Comparison of mNUTRIC-S2 and mNUTRIC scores to assess nutritional risk and predict intensive care unit mortality.Acute and critical care · 2022Article
- Use of modified-NUTRIC score to assess nutritional risk in surgical intensive care unit.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Approaches to Nutritional Screening in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In critically ill patients, malnutrition is known to increase morbidity and mortality. We investigated the relationship between nutritional support and 28-day mortality using the modified NUTrition RIsk in the Critically ill (NUTRIC) score in patients with sepsis. This retrospective cohort study included patients with sepsis admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2011 and June 2017. Nutritional support for energy and protein intakes at day 7 of ICU admission were categorized into <20, 20 to <25, and ≥25 kcal/kg and <1.0, 1.0 to <1.2, and ≥1.2 g/kg, respectively. NUTRIC scores ≥4 were considered to indicate high nutritional risk. Among patients with low nutritional risk, higher intakes of energy (≥25 kcal/kg) and protein (≥1.2 g/kg) were not significantly associated with lower 28-day mortality. In patients with high nutritional risk, higher energy intakes of ≥25 kcal/kg were significantly associated with lower 28-day mortality compared to intakes of <20 kcal/kg (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.569, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.339-0.962,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.