Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443149›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 4: Neck Pain.

Michele Sterling, Rutger M J de Zoete, Iris Coppieters, Scott F Farrell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06086834 (Comparative Effects of McKenzie Retraction and Bruegger's Exercises on Forward Head Posture Among Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06086834 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of McKenzie Retraction and Bruegger's Exercises on Forward Head Posture Among Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsForward Head PostureArmsMcKenzie Retraction Exercises, Bruegger's Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele SterlingRECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 4006 Brisbane, Australia. m.sterling@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-2248
Rutger M J de ZoeteRECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 4006 Brisbane, Australia.
Iris CoppietersPain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1598-632X
Scott F FarrellRECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 4006 Brisbane, Australia.
Griffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck pain, whether from a traumatic event such as a motor vehicle crash or of a non-traumatic nature, is a leading cause of worldwide disability. This narrative review evaluated the evidence from systematic reviews, recent randomised controlled trials, clinical practice guidelines, and other relevant studies for the effects of rehabilitation approaches for chronic neck pain. Rehabilitation was defined as the aim to restore a person to health or normal life through training and therapy and as such, passive interventions applied in isolation were not considered. The results of this review found that the strongest treatment effects to date are those associated with exercise. Strengthening exercises of the neck and upper quadrant have a moderate effect on neck pain in the short-term. The evidence was of moderate quality at best, indicating that future research will likely change these conclusions. Lower quality evidence and smaller effects were found for other exercise approaches. Other treatments, including education/advice and psychological treatment, showed only very small to small effects, based on low to moderate quality evidence. The review also provided suggestions for promising future directions for clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

exerciseneck painpsychology reviewrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31443149
PMCPMC6723111
OpenAlexW2967092555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.