Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31443134›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress2020

Techno-economic analysis of a plant-based platform for manufacturing antimicrobial proteins for food safety.

Matthew J McNulty, Yuri Gleba, Daniel Tusé, Simone Hahn-Löbmann, Anatoli Giritch, Somen Nandi, Karen A McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Plant-Derived Human Vaccines: Recent Developments.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew J McNultyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-102X
Yuri GlebaNomad Bioscience GmbH, Halle, Germany.
Daniel TuséDT/Consulting Group, Sacramento, California.
Simone Hahn-LöbmannNomad Bioscience GmbH, Halle, Germany.
Anatoli GiritchNomad Bioscience GmbH, Halle, Germany.
Somen NandiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California.
Karen A McDonaldDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5145-9968

Funding

Nomad Bioscience GmbHUC Davis Innovation Institute for Food and Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous reports of foodborne illnesses worldwide and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria mandate novel interventions to assure the safety of our food. Treatment of a variety of foods with bacteriophage-derived lysins and bacteriocin-class antimicrobial proteins has been shown to protect against high-risk pathogens at multiple intervention points along the food supply chain. The most significant barrier to the adoption of antimicrobial proteins as a food safety intervention by the food industry is the high production cost using current fermentation-based approaches. Recently, plants have been shown to produce antimicrobial proteins with accumulation as high as 3 g/kg fresh weight and with demonstrated activity against major foodborne pathogens. To investigate potential economic advantages and scalability of this novel platform, we evaluated a highly efficient transgenic plant-based production process. A detailed process simulation model was developed to help identify economic "hot spots" for research and development focus including process operating parameters, unit operations, consumables, and/or raw materials that have the most significant impact on production costs. Our analyses indicate that the unit production cost of antimicrobial proteins in plants at commercial scale for three scenarios is $3.00-6.88/g, which can support a competitive selling price to traditional food safety treatments.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisFoodborne DiseasesFood SafetyPlants, Genetically ModifiedPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteinsplant-based production platformsproduction of antimicrobial proteinstechno-economic modeling

Identifiers

PMID31443134
PMCPMC7027456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.