Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442814›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2019

E-cigarette use and sleep-related complaints among youth.

Kira E Riehm, Darlynn M Rojo-Wissar, Kenneth A Feder, Ramin Mojtabai, Adam P Spira, Johannes Thrul, Rosa M Crum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Electronic Cigarettes: A Pro-Con Review of the Current Literature.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kira E RiehmDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Electronic address: kriehm@jhu.edu.
Darlynn M Rojo-WissarDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Kenneth A FederDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ramin MojtabaiDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1800 Orleans Street, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Adam P SpiraDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1800 Orleans Street, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Center on Aging and Health, Suite 2-700, 2024 E Monument Street, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johannes ThrulDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Rosa M CrumDepartment of Mental Health, 8th Floor, 624 N Broadway, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1800 Orleans Street, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Department of Epidemiology, 615 N Wolfe Street, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, 2024 E Monument Street, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH014592 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEATHER E VOLK, Peter P. Zandi · 1985 to 2026
$8.5M
Collateral Consequences of the United States Opioid Epidemic for ChildrenF31DA044699 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FEDER, KENNETH · 2017 to 2018
$82k
CIHRNIDA NIH HHS F31 DA044699NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette use is highly prevalent among adolescents. However, little research has examined the relationship between e-cigarette use and sleep-related complaints in this population. The objective of this study was to assess whether exclusive e-cigarette, exclusive combusted cigarette, and dual-product use are associated with sleep-related complaints among adolescents.

methodsParticipants were 9,588 U.S. adolescents from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a nationally representative cohort, followed from 2013 through 2015. Using logistic regression, we examined the cross-sectional association between past-year e-cigarette, combusted cigarette, or dual-product use and past-year sleep-related complaints (bad dreams, sleeping restlessly, or falling asleep during the day), both measured at Wave 2. We controlled for Wave 1 demographic characteristics, emotional and behavioral health, and prior history of e-cigarette use, combusted cigarette use, and sleep-related complaints.

resultsIn unadjusted analyses, e-cigarette, combusted cigarette, and dual-product use were significantly associated with greater odds of sleep-related complaints, compared to use of neither product (e-cigarettes: OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.34-1.94; combusted cigarettes: OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.26-2.09; dual-product use: OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.63-2.46). Associations between e-cigarette and dual-product use and sleep-related complaints remained significant in fully adjusted analyses (e-cigarettes: aOR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59; dual-product use: aOR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.24-1.99), whereas associations with combusted cigarette use were significant in all models except the fully adjusted model (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.98-1.71).

conclusionsE-cigarette and dual-product use are significantly associated with greater odds of reporting sleep-related complaints among adolescents. Future research should evaluate whether this association may be causal.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesSleep Wake DisordersVapingAdolescentsE-cigarettesSleep problemsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID31442814
PMCPMC6803098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.