Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442788›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2019

JUUL in school: JUUL electronic cigarette use patterns, reasons for use, and social normative perceptions among college student ever users.

Eleanor L S Leavens, Elise M Stevens, Emma I Brett, Thad R Leffingwell, Theodore L Wagener

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04974580 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Young Adult Vaping Cessation: A Randomized Trial Examining Phone Coaching, Text-based Digital Intervention, and Nicotine Replacement Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled508ConditionsNicotine Dependence, E-Cig UseArmsNicotine patch, Phone Counseling, Digital Coaching
NCT05887947 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of E-cigarette Nicotine Concentration on Compensation, Cigarette Smoking, and Biomarkers of Exposure and Harm in Diverse Smokers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled52ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsElectronic Cigarette with 5% Nicotine Concentration, Electronic Cigarette with 1.8% Nicotine Concentration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Optimizing Images for an E-Cigarette Messaging Campaign: Liking and Perceived Effectiveness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eleanor L S LeavensOklahoma Tobacco Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA; Oklahoma State University, Department of Psychology, USA. Electronic address: leavens@okstate.edu.
Elise M StevensOklahoma Tobacco Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
Emma I BrettOklahoma State University, Department of Psychology, USA.
Thad R LeffingwellOklahoma State University, Department of Psychology, USA.
Theodore L WagenerOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: theodore.wagener@osumc.edu.

Funding

Examination of First and Second Generation E-cigarettesR01CA204891 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI WAGENER, THEODORE LEE · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Young Adults Responses to E-Cigarette Advertisement Features and the Effect of Restricting Features on Tobacco UseK99DA046563 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI STEVENS, ELISE MARIE · 2019 to 2020
$237k
NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR001047NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204891NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA046563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJUUL electronic cigarettes have surged in popularity since their emergence on the market in 2015. JUUL is slim and simple in design and is capable of delivering cigarette-like levels of nicotine. However, little research has examined JUUL use patterns, reasons for use, and normative perceptions of JUUL among young adults.

methodsParticipants were college students (N = 243) who reported ever using a JUUL electronic cigarette. Eligible participants completed a survey assessing JUUL use patterns, reasons for JUUL use, and normative perceptions of JUUL.

resultsMost participants reported using JUUL once or twice (47.7%) and almost one-third reported using JUUL daily or monthly (29.6%). Overall, participants reported a low level of nicotine dependence (M

conclusionsThe high percentage of daily and monthly JUUL users coupled with the relatively high rates of perceived acceptability of use indicates the possibility of high uptake among college students. Findings also suggest college students perceive JUUL as highly acceptable and that their friend's use and curiosity were primary motivators of their initial use, indicating the importance of peer influence in college student JUUL use.

Indexed as

AttitudeMotivationPeer InfluenceSocial NormsAdolescentElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsExploratory BehaviorFemaleFriendsHumansMaleStudentsUniversitiesVapingYoung AdultCollege studentsElectronic cigaretteNormative perceptions

Identifiers

PMID31442788
PMCPMC7153300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.