Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442677›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2019

Narratives of people who inject drugs on factors contributing to opioid overdose.

Jamie Suki Chang, Emily Behar, Phillip O Coffin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of COVID-19 on Overdose Risk Behaviors Among People Who Inject Drugs in Wisconsin.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie Suki ChangSanta Clara University, Public Health Science Program, United States; University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address: jschang@scu.edu.
Emily BeharUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States.
Phillip O CoffinUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Substance Use Disorders Treatment/Services Research Training ProgramT32DA007250 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Derek D Satre, Janice Y Tsoh · 1991 to 2026
$7.4M
Midcareer K24 Award for Mentoring and Patient-Oriented ResearchK24DA042720 · NIDA · SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PHILLIP O COFFIN · 2016 to 2026
$1.6M
Repeated-dose Brief Intervention to Reduce Overdose and Risk Behaviors Among NaloR34DA037194 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI COFFIN, PHILLIP O · 2014 to 2016
$501k
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA042720NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA037194NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been increasing national and global attention to opioid overdoses. In San Francisco, it is estimated that the population of people who inject drugs (PWID) has more than doubled in the past ten years. The risk factors for opioid overdose have been examined closely, but firsthand accounts of PWID who have experienced overdoses are less documented. In this paper, we use two theories - lay expertise and structural vulnerabilities - as frameworks to frame and qualitatively examine the narratives of PWID surrounding their recent overdose experiences.

methodsAudio-recorded semi-structured open-ended motivational interviewing counseling sessions were conducted with PWID in San Francisco who have experienced at least one non-fatal overdose event (N = 40). Participants discussed the context of recent opioid overdoses, either witnessed or personally experienced, focusing on their perceptions of unique contributing factors. Interview data were coded and analysed using ATLAS.ti. We used a thematic content analysis approach to qualitatively analyze data queries and generate themes. We used theories of structural vulnerability and lay expertise to frame the analysis.

resultsUsing quotes from the participants, we report four central themes that contributed to participants' overdose experiences: 1) Social Dynamics and Opioid Expertise; 2) Uncertain Supply, Composition, Source; 3) Balancing Polysubstance Use, and 4) Emotional Pain.

conclusionAs PWID described their overdose experiences, many factors that contributed to their overdoses were situated at the structural level. The everyday, lived experiences of PWID often competed or conflicted with public health messages and approaches. The accumulated expertise of PWID about everyday risk factors can be leveraged by public health practitioners to inform and improve overdose prevention interventions and messages.

Indexed as

AdultDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingOpioid-Related DisordersRisk FactorsSan FranciscoSubstance Abuse, IntravenousYoung AdultOpioid overdosePeople who inject drugsQualitative methodsStructural vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID31442677
PMCPMC11702908
OpenAlexW2969555654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.