Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442299›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2020

No evidence for cell-to-cell transmission of the unfolded protein response in cell culture.

Anna M van Ziel, Kimberly Wolzak, Anna Nölle, Petrus J Hoetjes, Ernesto Berenjeno-Correa, Eelco van Anken, Eduard A Struys, Wiep Scheper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna M van ZielDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kimberly WolzakDepartment of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna NölleDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petrus J HoetjesDepartment of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ernesto Berenjeno-CorreaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eelco van AnkenDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Eduard A StruysDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wiep ScheperDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-4559
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is one of the major cell-autonomous proteostatic stress responses. The UPR has been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and is therefore actively investigated as therapeutic target. In this respect, cell non-autonomous effects of the UPR including the reported cell-to-cell transmission of UPR activity may be highly important. A pharmaca-based UPR induction was employed to generate conditioned media (CM) from CM-donating neuronal ('donor') cells (SK-N-SH and primary mouse neurons). As previously reported, upon subsequent transfer of CM to naive neuronal 'acceptor' cells, we confirmed UPR target mRNA and protein expression by qPCR and automated microscopy. However, UPR target gene expression was also induced in the absence of donor cells, indicating carry-over of pharmaca. Genetic induction of single pathways of the UPR in donor cells did not result in UPR transmission to acceptor cells. Moreover, no transmission was detected upon full UPR activation by nutrient deprivation or inducible expression of the heavy chain of immunoglobulin M in donor HeLa cells. In addition, in direct co-culture of donor cells expressing the immunoglobulin M heavy chain and fluorescent UPR reporter acceptor HeLa cells, UPR transmission was not observed. In conclusion, carry-over of pharmaca is a major confounding factor in pharmaca-based UPR transmission protocols that are therefore unsuitable to study cell-to-cell UPR transmission. In addition, the absence of UPR transmission in non-pharmaca-based models of UPR activation indicates that cell-to-cell UPR transmission does not occur in cell culture.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell CommunicationCell Line, TumorCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHeLa CellsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPregnancyUnfolded Protein ResponseAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnzyme Inhibitorscell non-autonomousendoplasmic reticulum stressneurodegenerative diseasesproteostasisunfolded protein responseUPR transmission

Identifiers

PMID31442299
PMCPMC7003778
OpenAlexW2969793818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.