Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Modeling reconstruction-related behavior and evaluation of influences of major information sources.

Kosuke Shirai, Nobuaki Yoshizawa, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Michio Murakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kosuke ShiraiNuclear Safety Division, Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7671-418X
Nobuaki YoshizawaNuclear Safety Division, Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitake TakebayashiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan.
Michio MurakamiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction has progressed steadily since the 2011 TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. However, some people still hesitate to eat foods from Fukushima or to travel there, and there are concerns about the health risks of radiation. We investigated the relationships among reconstruction-related behavior, risk perception, types of information, and information sources, in order to consider appropriate measures for providing information and promoting reconstruction-related behavior a number of years after the accident. We conducted an online questionnaire survey (n = 1000) of Tokyo residents. First, a factor analysis was conducted on knowledge associated with radiation. Two factors were extracted; namely, "physical knowledge" and "health/social knowledge." We conducted structural equation modeling to construct a model of "knowledge," "radiation risk perception," and "intention concerning reconstruction-related behavior." "Intention concerning reconstruction-related behavior" decreased with "radiation risk perception" and increased with "health/social knowledge." In addition, "health/social knowledge" negatively affected "radiation risk perception;" this effect was not large, but it was significant. Second, respondents were clarified by information sources using a cluster analysis. Clusters that included respondents who got information from public relations materials issued by municipalities and websites of administrative agencies had a higher factor score for "health/social knowledge" than other clusters. The cluster of respondents who did not get any particular knowledge had the lowest factor score, which was significant, and also had a low "perception of reconstruction."

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentInformation DisseminationAdultAnalysis of VarianceBehaviorCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRadiation ExposureSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31442280
PMCPMC6707550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.