Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31442275›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Chronic wound microbiome colonization on mouse model following cryogenic preservation.

Craig D Tipton, Nicholas E Sanford, Jake A Everett, Rebecca A Gabrilska, Randall D Wolcott, Kendra P Rumbaugh, Caleb D Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Craig D TiptonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-9371
Nicholas E SanfordSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7451-8684
Jake A EverettDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Rebecca A GabrilskaDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Randall D WolcottSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Kendra P RumbaughDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Caleb D PhillipsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wound infections are increasingly recognized to be dynamic and polymicrobial in nature, necessitating the development of wound models which reflect the complexities of infection in a non-healing wound. Wound slough isolated from human chronic wounds and transferred to mice was recently shown to create polymicrobial infection in mice, and there is potential this tool may be improved by cryogenic preservation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of cryogenic preservation to transferring polymicrobial communities, specifically by quantifying the effects of cryopreservation and wound microbiome transplantation. Slough from an established murine polymicrobial surgical excision model and five patients were subjected to three preservation strategies: refrigeration until infection, freezing in liquid nitrogen, or freezing in liquid nitrogen with glycerol solution prior to infection in individual mice. Four days following inoculation onto mice, wound microbiota were quantified using either culture isolation or by 16s rRNA gene community profiling and quantitative PCR. Cryogenic preservation did not significantly reduce bacterial viability. Reestablished microbial communities were significantly associated with patient of origin as well as host context (i.e., originally preserved from a patient versus mouse infection). Whereas preservation treatment did not significantly shape community composition, the transfers of microbiomes from human to mouse were characterized by reduced diversity and compositional changes. These findings indicated that changes should be expected to occur to community structure after colonization, and that compositional change is likely due to the rapid change in infection context as opposed to preservation strategy. Furthermore, species that were present in higher relative abundance in wound inoculate were more likely to colonize subsequent wounds, and wound inoculate with higher bacterial load established wound communities that were more compositionally similar. Results inform expectations for the complementation of chronic wound in vivo modeling with cryogenic preservation archives.

Indexed as

CryopreservationMicrobiotaAnimalsBacterial LoadCell SurvivalChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFreezingHumansMiceWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID31442275
PMCPMC6707584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.