ArticlePloS one2019
Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Low Dose Aspirin for Preventing Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Preeclampsia in Sickle Cell Pregnancy (PIPSICKLE): a Randomized Controlled Trial
AI-Powered CURAᵀᴹ Application for Identifying At-Risk Pregnancies in Obstetric Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial (CURAte)
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Prediction Models for Preeclampsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Classical Regression Models in Pre-Eclampsia Prediction: A Systematic Review.Current hypertension reports · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning models for predicting preeclampsia: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based First-Trimester Antenatal Risk Prediction for Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Multicenter Model Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of a predictive model for preeclampsia utilizing time-of-flight mass spectrometry based on novel nanomaterials integrated with machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning models for early prediction of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Validation of a machine-learning-based algorithm to predict preeclampsia-related adverse outcomes on a real-world dataset.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for predicting Major Obstetric Emergencies: Current Evidence, Clinical Translation, and Future Directions.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- The clinical value of nomogram combined with machine learning models in predicting the progression of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy to severe preeclampsia.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Gap in Rural Maternal Health: Initial Validation of a Parsimonious Clinical Model for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in a Honduran Hospital.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Machine learning predictive system to predict the risk of developing pre-eclampsia.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine Learning Models to Predict Risk of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality From Electronic Medical Record Data: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Bogotá, Colombia: Differential Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation Using Traditional Statistics and Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- An Explainable Fuzzy Framework for Assessing Preeclampsia Classification.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Improved Prediction Accuracy for Late-Onset Preeclampsia Using cfRNA Profiles: A Comparative Study of Marker Selection Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Due to the lack of effective preventive measures, its prediction is essential to its prompt management. This study aimed to develop models using machine learning to predict late-onset preeclampsia using hospital electronic medical record data. The performance of the machine learning based models and models using conventional statistical methods were also compared. A total of 11,006 pregnant women who received antenatal care at Yonsei University Hospital were included. Maternal data were retrieved from electronic medical records during the early second trimester to 34 weeks. The prediction outcome was late-onset preeclampsia occurrence after 34 weeks' gestation. Pattern recognition and cluster analysis were used to select the parameters included in the prediction models. Logistic regression, decision tree model, naïve Bayes classification, support vector machine, random forest algorithm, and stochastic gradient boosting method were used to construct the prediction models. C-statistics was used to assess the performance of each model. The overall preeclampsia development rate was 4.7% (474 patients). Systolic blood pressure, serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels, platelet counts, serum potassium level, white blood cell count, serum calcium level, and urinary protein were the most influential variables included in the prediction models. C-statistics for the decision tree model, naïve Bayes classification, support vector machine, random forest algorithm, stochastic gradient boosting method, and logistic regression models were 0.857, 0.776, 0.573, 0.894, 0.924, and 0.806, respectively. The stochastic gradient boosting model had the best prediction performance with an accuracy and false positive rate of 0.973 and 0.009, respectively. The combined use of maternal factors and common antenatal laboratory data of the early second trimester through early third trimester could effectively predict late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning algorithms. Future prospective studies are needed to verify the clinical applicability algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.