Trial reportDrug testing and analysis2019
Detection of Δ
Trial report in Drug testing and analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol detection times using mass spectroscopy in oral fluid: a systematic review using a 5 ng/mL cut-off value.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of ΔDrug testing and analysis · 2024Trial
- Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for ΔDrug testing and analysis · 2022Trial
- Detection of ΔDrug testing and analysis · 2019Trial
- Does acute stress induced via cold water immersion increase blood THC concentrations in regular cannabis users?Psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- An Overview of the Potential for Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Drugs and Cannabis Products in Humans.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The driving-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of cannabis users in the Australian Capital Territory following decriminalisation.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the development of portable technologies and commercial products to detect ΔJournal of cannabis research · 2024Review
- Review
- Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
- Review
- Glycosylated gold nanoparticles in point of care diagnostics: from aggregation to lateral flow.Chemical Society reviews · 2022Review
- Towards the Validation of an Observational Tool to Detect Impaired Drivers-An Online Video Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- Cannabis and Driving.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Prescribing medicinal cannabis.Australian prescriber · 2020Review
- Cannabidiol (CBD) and ΔBMJ open · 2020Article
- Thermographic detection and quantification of THC in oral fluid at unprecedented low concentrations.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point-of-collection testing (POCT) for Δ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.