Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441893›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2019

Clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection for reducing scars in patients with forehead laceration: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study.

Seong Hwan Kim, Seong Joo Lee, Jun Won Lee, Hii Sun Jeong, In Suck Suh

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prospects for Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Prevention of Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars after Surgeries.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. [Research advances on pharmacological interventions for hypertrophic scar].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. [Clinical application and mechanism of botulinum toxin type A in scar treatment].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seong Hwan KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Joo Lee
Jun Won Lee
Hii Sun Jeong
In Suck Suh
Hallym University Medical Center · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is known to prevent fibroblast proliferation and expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). It also induces temporary muscle paralysis and decreases tension vectors. Fibroblasts induce scar contracture and hypertrophy by producing collagen fibers in wound healing processes. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of BoNTA on the scar formation.

methodsForty-five patients with forehead laceration were enrolled in this study and randomized into 2 groups with or without injection of BoNTA. When the patients presented to the clinic to remove the stitches, BoNTA was injected to the BoNTA group with 24 patients and saline was injected to the control group with 21 patients. The BoNTA was injected on dermal layer with 5 IU/cm. After that, follow-up was done in 1, 3, and 6 months. The scars were analyzed with the patient and observer scar assessment scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales (SBSESs), and visual analog scale (VAS) and analyzed with independent T-test, along with clinical photographs, cutometer, and biopsies.

resultsIn all scar scales, the scores changed into favorable direction in both groups and the changes were larger in BoNTA group compared with the control group. On SBSES and VAS, better improvements on BoNTA group showed statistical significance. Skin biopsy showed less collagen deposition on dermal layer in BoNTA group.

conclusionImprovement of aesthetic, functional, and emotional aspect of the scar formation in the groups treated with BoNTA was illustrated. The application of BoNTA may be expanded to prevent hypertrophic scar after trauma, burns, or operations.

Indexed as

AdultBotulinum Toxins, Type ACicatrix, HypertrophicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFibroblastsForeheadHumansInjectionsLacerationsMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular AgentsProspective StudiesSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID31441893
PMCPMC6716761
OpenAlexW2969917293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.