Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441522›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

A general approach to detect gene (G)-environment (E) additive interaction leveraging G-E independence in case-control studies.

Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, Xu Shi, Benedict H W Wong, Tamar Sofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric J Tchetgen TchetgenDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Xu ShiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8566-9552
Benedict H W WongDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-8305
Tamar SoferBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8520-8860

Funding

Next Generation Missing Data Methods in HIV ResearchR01AI127271 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Theory and methods for mediation and interactionR01CA222147 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL, VANDERWEELE, TYLER · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
Identification and Inference for Longitudinal Causal Mediation Analysis in HIVR01AI104459 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SHPITSER, ILYA, VANDERWEELE, TYLER · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222147NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104459NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is increasingly of interest in statistical genetics to test for the presence of an additive interaction between genetic (G) and environmental (E) risk factors. In case-control studies involving a rare disease, a statistical test of no additive G×E interaction typically entails a test of no relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). It has been shown that a likelihood ratio test of a null RERI incorporating the G-E independence assumption (RERI-LRT) outperforms the standard approach. The RERI-LRT relies on correct specification of a logistic model for the binary outcome, as a function of G, E, and auxiliary covariates. However, when at least one exposure is not categorical or auxiliary covariates are present, nonparametric estimation may not be feasible, while parametric logistic regression will a priori rule out the null hypothesis of no additive interaction in most practical situations, inflating type I error rate. In this paper, we present a general approach to test for G × E additive interaction exploiting G-E independence. Unlike the RERI-LRT, it allows the regression model for the binary outcome to remain unrestricted, and nonetheless still allows for covariate adjustment in order to ensure the G-E independence assumption or to rule out residual confounding. The methods are illustrated through extensive simulation studies and an ovarian cancer study.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionModels, StatisticalCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansOvarian NeoplasmsRisk Factorscase-control studygene-environment additive interactiongene-environment independence

Identifiers

PMID31441522
PMCPMC6959489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.