Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2020
Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05312775 (Single Versus Double-layer Closure of The Cesarean Scar In Niche Development), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single Versus Double-layer Closure of The Cesarean Scar In Niche Development: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery and risk of uterine scar niche: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Two-layer interrupted versus two-layer continuous sutures for preventing cesarean scar defect: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2020Trial
- Effect of cervical changes on the cesarean scar topography after primary cesarean sections: an observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Ranking of Risk Factors Leading to Uterine Scar Defect-Systematic Online Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Single- vs double-layer uterine closure of the cesarean scar in niche development: the Nicest Study.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- A prospective study on risk factors associated with the development of isthmocele after caesarean section.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Contrast Hysterosonographic Evaluation of Niche Prevalence Following a Standardized Suturing Technique for Caesarean Sections.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of cervical changes on the cesarean scar area and niche formation after preterm and term cesarean sections.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Article
- Intra-operative Guidelines for the Prevention of Uterine Niche Formation in Cesarean Sections: A Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Article
- Letter on Genovese et al.'s "Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review".Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2023Article
- Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysisTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2021Review
- Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.Human reproduction open · 2021Article
- Ultrasound vs. histologic findings in 40 patients with special types of ectopic pregnancy.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Exploratory Study of Cesarean Scar Healing After Interrupted Versus Continuous Sutures: Prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment in Cynomolgus Monkeys.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study compared healing of the scars after cesarean section during the first postpartum year using a single- or double-layer suturing technique. Scarring was assessed by a transvaginal ultrasound. We explored the appearance and localization of uterine scars with regard to the obstetric history. Our aim was to compare the position of the scar or defect, if present, its dimensions, and any residual myometrium with respect to the suturing technique during the cesarean section. MATERIAL AND
methodsWomen with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies indicated for elective or acute cesarean section were randomly allocated to the uterine closure technique group. During the first postpartum year, their lower uterine segment was examined with a transvaginal ultrasound in three consecutive visits at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months.
results324 women attended the 12-month visit; of these, 149 underwent single-layer closure of the uterine incision and 175 double-layer technique. A higher proportion of the defects is seen in the single-layer closure technique of suturing. Defects in the single-layer group were wider (0.002) and the residual myometrial thickness in the single-layer group were thinner (0.019). Women who underwent cesarean section at the stage of full cervical dilation had scars that were closer to the external cervical os (0.000). The position of the uterus varies greatly between controls (0.000). The combination of uterine position and scar defect presence changed significantly between controls (0.001), and was significantly dependent on the suturing method (0.003). Defects with or without contact with the uterine cavity changed statistically between controls (0.017). Both types of defects were more common in the single-layer closure technique group.
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate that double-layer technique with the first continuous nonlocking suture followed by a second continuous nonlocking suture is associated with better suture healing and greater residual myometrial thickness. No difference was observed between single- and double-layer closure for the presence of maternal infectious morbidity, wound infection or blood transfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.