Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441378›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2020

Skull Fractures Induce Neuroinflammation and Worsen Outcomes after Closed Head Injury in Mice.

Liga Zvejniece, Gundega Stelfa, Edijs Vavers, Einars Kupats, Janis Kuka, Baiba Svalbe, Baiba Zvejniece, Christiane Albert-Weissenberger, Anna-Leena Sirén, Nikolaus Plesnila and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adenosine AJournal of neuroinflammation · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Liga ZvejnieceLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Gundega StelfaLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Edijs VaversLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Einars KupatsLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Janis KukaLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Baiba SvalbeLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Baiba ZvejnieceLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Christiane Albert-WeissenbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna-Leena SirénDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Nikolaus PlesnilaUniversity of Munich, Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Munich, Germany.
Maija DambrovaLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Latvijas Organiskās Sintēzes Institūts · LVUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DELatvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies · LVStroke Association · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The weight-drop model is used widely to replicate closed-head injuries in mice; however, the histopathological and functional outcomes may vary significantly between laboratories. Because skull fractures are reported to occur in this model, we aimed to evaluate whether these breaks may influence the variability of the weight-drop (WD) model. Male Swiss Webster mice underwent WD injury with either a 2 or 5 mm cone tip, and behavior was assessed at 2 h and 24 h thereafter using the neurological severity score. The expression of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 genes was measured at 12 h and 1, 3, and 14 days after injury. Before the injury, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was performed to quantify skull thickness at the impact site. With a conventional tip diameter of 2 mm, 33% of mice showed fractures of the parietal bone; the 5 mm tip produced only 10% fractures. Compared with mice without fractures, mice with fractures had a severity-dependent worse functional outcome and a more pronounced upregulation of inflammatory genes in the brain. Older mice were associated with thicker parietal bones and were less prone to skull fractures. In addition, mice that underwent traumatic brain injury (TBI) with skull fracture had macroscopic brain damage because of skull depression. Skull fractures explain a considerable proportion of the variability observed in the WD model in mice-i.e., mice with skull fractures have a much stronger inflammatory response than do mice without fractures. Using older mice with thicker skull bones and an impact cone with a larger diameter reduces the rate of skull fractures and the variability in this very useful closed-head TBI model.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticHead Injuries, ClosedInflammationMaleMiceSkull Fracturesneuroinflammationskull fracturetraumatic brain injuryweight-drop model

Identifiers

PMID31441378
PMCPMC6964812
OpenAlexW2969724102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.