Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441110›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2019

Patient safety culture among European cancer nurses-An exploratory, cross-sectional survey comparing data from Estonia, Germany, Netherlands, and United Kingdom.

Lena Sharp, Kristi Rannus, Anna Olofsson, Daniel Kelly, Wendy H Oldenmenger, EONS RECaN group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nurses' contribution to antimicrobial stewardship: business as usual?Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024
    Article
  9. An Innovation in Cancer Nursing Education Across Europe: A Pilot Evaluation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The experiences of cancer nurses working in four European countries: A qualitative study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lena SharpRegional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-6992
Kristi RannusNorth Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
Anna OlofssonRegional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel KellySchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-0655
Wendy H OldenmengerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-6505
EONS RECaN group

Funding

European Cancer OrganisationEuropean Oncology Nursing Society no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the differences in perceived patient safety culture in cancer nurses working in Estonia, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

designAn exploratory cross-sectional survey.

methodsIn 2018, 393 cancer nurses completed the 12 dimensions of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.

resultsThe mean score for the overall patient safety grade was 61.3. The highest rated dimension was "teamwork within units" while "staffing" was the lowest in all four countries. Nurses in the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom, scored higher on "communication openness", the "frequency of events reported", and "non-punitive response to errors", than nurses from Estonia or Germany. We found statistically significant differences between the countries for the association between five of the 12 dimensions with the overall patient safety grade: overall perception of patient safety, communication openness, staffing, handoffs and transitions and non-punitive response to errors.

conclusionPatient safety culture, as reported by cancer nurses, varies between European countries and contextual factors, such as recognition of the nursing role and education have an impact on it. Cancer nurses' role in promoting patient safety is a key concern and requires better recognition on a European and global level. IMPACT: Cancer Nursing Societies in any country can use these data as an indication on how to improve patient care in their country. Recognition of cancer nursing as a distinct specialty in nursing will help to improve patient safety.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansNeoplasmsNurse SpecialistsNurse's RoleOncology NursingOrganizational CulturePatient SafetySafety ManagementSurveys and Questionnairescancer nurseshospital survey on patient safetynursingpatient safety culture

Identifiers

PMID31441110
PMCPMC6899826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.