Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441084›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2019

VAP-SCRN1 interaction regulates dynamic endoplasmic reticulum remodeling and presynaptic function.

Feline W Lindhout, Yujie Cao, Josta T Kevenaar, Anna Bodzęta, Riccardo Stucchi, Maria M Boumpoutsari, Eugene A Katrukha, Maarten Altelaar, Harold D MacGillavry, Casper C Hoogenraad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Axonal ER CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Activity-dependent endoplasmic reticulum CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feline W LindhoutDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5075-5434
Yujie CaoDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Josta T KevenaarDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anna BodzętaDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Riccardo StucchiDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria M BoumpoutsariDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-9164
Eugene A KatrukhaDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten AltelaarBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-5945
Harold D MacGillavryDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Casper C HoogenraadDepartment of Biology, Cell Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-0758
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

EC | H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) 617050EC | H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) 716011National Roadmap Large-scale Research Facilities of the Netherlands 184.032.201Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) 723.012.102Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) 865.10.010ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 912.16.058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neurons, the continuous and dynamic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network extends throughout the axon, and its dysfunction causes various axonopathies. However, it remains largely unknown how ER integrity and remodeling modulate presynaptic function in mammalian neurons. Here, we demonstrated that ER membrane receptors VAPA and VAPB are involved in modulating the synaptic vesicle (SV) cycle. VAP interacts with secernin-1 (SCRN1) at the ER membrane via a single FFAT-like motif. Similar to VAP, loss of SCRN1 or SCRN1-VAP interactions resulted in impaired SV cycling. Consistently, SCRN1 or VAP depletion was accompanied by decreased action potential-evoked Ca

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiological TransportCalciumCell MembraneEndoplasmic ReticulumFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsPresynaptic TerminalsProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsRatsCalciumMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSCRN1 protein, humanVapa protein, ratVAPB protein, rataxonendoplasmic reticulumsecerninsynaptic vesicle cycleVAP

Identifiers

PMID31441084
PMCPMC6792018
OpenAlexW2969293681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.