ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019
Application of Quantitative Motor Assessments in Friedreich Ataxia and Evaluation of Their Relation to Clinical Measures.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Motor Outcomes Capture Upper Limb and Mild Stage Impairment in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Progress and challenges in sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxias.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Digital Outcomes of Upper Limb Ataxia Capture Meaningful Longitudinal Change and Treatment Response.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Multifeature quantitative motor assessment of upper limb ataxia including drawing and reaching.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- A natural history study to track brain and spinal cord changes in individuals with Friedreich's ataxia: TRACK-FA study protocol.PloS one · 2022Article
- Developing an Instrumented Measure of Upper Limb Function in Friedreich Ataxia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is a rare autosomal-recessive slowly progressive neurodegenerative disorder. As common clinical measures for this devastating disease lack sensitivity, we explored whether (a) the quantitative motor assessments of the Q-Motor battery can enhance clinical characterisation of FRDA; (b) clinical measures can predict Q-Motor outcomes and (c) Q-Motor is sensitive to longitudinal change. At baseline 29 patients and 23 controls and in a 1-year follow-up 14 patients and 6 controls were included. The Q-Motor included lift (manumotography), finger tapping (digitomotography) and pronate/supinate (dysdiadochomotography) tasks. To model responses, a search of generalised linear models was conducted, selecting best fitting models, using demographic and clinical data as predictors. Predictors from selected models were used in linear mixed models to investigate longitudinal changes. Patients with FRDA performed worse than controls on most measures. Modelling of the pronate/supinate task was dominated by SCAFI (SCA functional index) subtasks, while tapping task and lift task models suggested a complex relationship with clinical measures. Longitudinal modelling implied minor changes from baseline to follow-up, while clinical scales mainly showed no change in this sample. Overall Q-Motor likely has favourable properties for assessing distinct motor aspects in severe FRDA as it can be administered in wheelchair-bound patients. Further longitudinal research is warranted to fully characterise its relation to routinely used measures and scales for FRDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31441004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.