Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31441001›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Severe Intestinal Dysbiosis in Rat Models of Short Bowel Syndrome with Ileocecal Resection.

Yuhua Huang, Aoxue Chen, Feilong Guo, Jian Wang, Yousheng Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dysbiosis and reduced small intestinal function are required to induce intestinal insufficiency in mice.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuhua HuangDepartment of Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Aoxue ChenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Feilong GuoDepartment of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yousheng LiDepartment of Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China. liyoushengjz@126.com.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENanjing University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Clinical Research Program of 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine JYLJ022National Natural Science Foundation of China 81270945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShort bowel syndrome (SBS) resulting from extensive intestinal resection is thought to significantly affect gut microbiota. Data are limited on the signatures of the intestinal microbiome in SBS with different anatomical types.

aimsThe aim of our investigation was to characterize the composition and function of gut microbiota in SBS with or without ileocecal resection (ICR).

methodsSix-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 75% small bowel resection (SBR) with the ileocecal junction intact (SBR group, jejunoileal anastomosis, n = 10) or removed (ICR group, jejunocolic anastomosis, n = 10), or sham surgery (sham group, n = 10). Colonic contents of the rats were collected 28 days after operation, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on the MiSeq Illumina platform to analyze bacterial composition.

resultsOverall structures of the gut microbiome differed significantly among the three groups. The bacterial α-diversity of the ICR group was remarkably lower than that of the sham group. ICR rats were enriched with Lactobacillus and opportunistic pathogens from Proteobacteria but depleted of commensal genera belonging to the Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and Erysipelotrichaceae families. Genera from the Bacteroidales S24-7 group, Porphyromonadaceae, Prevotellaceae, Rikenellaceae and Christensenellaceae were prevalent in SBR rats. Functional pathways of branched-chain and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and infectious diseases were abundant in the ICR group, while SBR rats featured pathways of C5 branched dibasic acid metabolism, biotin metabolism and one carbon pool folate.

conclusionsICR causes dramatically more severe intestinal dysbiosis than SBR only in SBS rat models, resulting in altered functional profiles of the gut microbiome.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsCecumColonDysbiosisEubacterialesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumJejunumLactobacillusMaleProteobacteriaRatsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeverity of Illness IndexShort Bowel SyndromeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDysbiosisIleocecal resectionIntestinal microbiomeShort bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31441001
OpenAlexW2969724131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.