ArticleObesity surgery2020
Internalizing, Externalizing, and Interpersonal Components of the MMPI-2-RF in Predicting Weight Change After Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 Eating Concerns (EAT) Scale: A study with National Guard veterans and their romantic partners.Psychological services · 2026Article
- Psychological Profiles and 12-Month Weight Outcomes of Women Evaluated for Reoperative Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Psychosocial and behavioral correlates of weight loss 12 to 15 years after bariatric surgery.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is commonly used to assess psychological factors that may adversely impact weight loss. Research is limited on the specific MMPI-2-RF scales that may predict poor postoperative outcomes following bariatric surgery. The current study compared preoperative MMPI-2-RF profiles associated with postoperative weight change to novel component scores in a bariatric surgery sample.
methodsOne hundred twenty-seven patients completed a preoperative medical evaluation, a test of reading ability, and the MMPI-2-RF. Percent weight loss was obtained postoperatively at 6 and 12 months.
resultsPrincipal components analysis (PCA) generated five novel subcomponents from within the internalizing, externalizing, and interpersonal substantive scales of the MMPI-2-RF. Among these components, higher externalizing and social conflict scores at baseline were predictive of less percent weight change postoperatively at 6 months. A similar trend was observed with higher insecurity scores predicting less weight loss at 6 months postoperatively. At 12-month follow-up, higher insecurity scores at baseline remained predictive of lower percentage weight loss, while social conflict trended toward significance in the same direction. Model comparisons of traditional MMPI-2-RF scales were found to be more sensitive than the novel subcomponents. Specifically, demoralization (RCd), antisocial behavior (RC4), hypomanic activation (RC9), family problems (FML), and shyness (SHY) significantly predicted weight change after surgery.
conclusionResults suggested that specific problems scales were not more effectively differentiated into more sensitive and specific component scores, but demonstrated supportive evidence that the traditional MMPI-2-RF scales indicating higher degrees of behavioral dysregulation, poor self-efficacy, and lower social support predict reduced postoperative weight loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31440955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.