Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440911›Full record

ReviewDrugs2019

Clinical Management of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).

Megan C Herink, Yan F Zhuo, Craig D Williams, Thomas G DeLoughery

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Should we monitor the direct oral anticoagulants?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan C HerinkDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, OSU/OHSU College of Pharmacy, 2730 SW Moody Ave., CL5CP, Portland, OR, 97201, USA. herink@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6402-0260
Yan F ZhuoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, OSU/OHSU College of Pharmacy, 2730 SW Moody Ave., CL5CP, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Craig D WilliamsDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, OSU/OHSU College of Pharmacy, 2730 SW Moody Ave., CL5CP, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Thomas G DeLougheryDepartment of Hematology, OHSU School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Portland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with warfarin, the direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have fewer pharmacokinetic drug interactions. However, significant drug interactions do exist with documented changes in DOAC concentrations, which can exceed 100%. Unlike warfarin, DOACs have no validated surrogate test to monitor the intensity of anticoagulation. However, several analyses of major outcomes trials with DOACs have demonstrated that serum concentrations do affect both the thrombotic benefits and the hemorrhagic risks of these agents. This paper reviews the known significant pharmacokinetic interactions with DOACs and includes considerations for their use in the presence of interacting medications.

Indexed as

Administration, OralFactor Xa InhibitorsHumansWarfarinFactor Xa InhibitorsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31440911
OpenAlexW2969591704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.