Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440891›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2019

Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.

Guang-Shu Yu, Yan-Bin Lin, Guo-Sheng Xiong, Hong-Bin Xu, You-Ying Liu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of tibiofibular syndesmosis stability following treatment of proximal, middle, and distal third fibula fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness of metal screws and absorbable screws in repair of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Progress in diagnosis and treatment of fibular fracture in ankle fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Maisonneuve injury with no fibula fracture: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guang-Shu YuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fu Zhou, 350007, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yan-Bin LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fu Zhou, 350007, Fujian, People's Republic of China. 812953900@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-3436
Guo-Sheng XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fu Zhou, 350007, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Bin XuGraduate school, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fu Zhou, 350122, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
You-Ying LiuGraduate school, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fu Zhou, 350122, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Xiamen University · CNFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTibiofibular syndesmosis injury leads to ankle pain and dysfunction when ankle injuries are not treated properly. Despite several studies having been performed, many questions about diagnosis and treatment remain unanswered, especially in ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations.

methodsThis review explores the mechanism of injury, clinical features, diagnosis methods, and the treatment strategy for ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury to highlight the current evidence in terms of the controversies surrounding the management of these injuries.

resultsRadiological and CT examination are an important basis for diagnosing ankle syndesmosis injury. Physical examination combined with MRI to determine the damage to the interosseous membrane is significant in guiding the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. In the past, inserting syndesmosis screws was the gold standard for treating ankle syndesmosis injury. However, there were increasingly more controversies regarding loss of reduction and broken nails, so elastic fixation has become more popular in recent years.

conclusionsAnatomical reduction and effective fixation are the main aspects to be considered in the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury and are the key to reducing postsurgery complications.

Indexed as

AdultAnkle FracturesAnkle InjuriesFibulaFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansInterosseous MembraneMalePractice Guidelines as TopicSoft Tissue InjuriesTibiaInjuriesInterosseous membraneManagementTibiofibular syndesmosis

Identifiers

PMID31440891
OpenAlexW2969267534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.