Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440821›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2019

Serum nectin-2 and nectin-4 are diagnostic in lung cancer: which is superior?

Kayhan Erturk, Sule Karaman, Nergiz Dagoglu, Murat Serilmez, Derya Duranyildiz, Faruk Tas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nectin-4: a Novel Therapeutic Target for Skin Cancers.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The CD112R/CD112 axis: a breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayhan ErturkInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. kayhanerturk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-6800
Sule KaramanInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nergiz DagogluInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Murat SerilmezInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Derya DuranyildizInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faruk TasInstitute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nectins are immunoglobulin-like molecules that are involved in cell to cell adhesion by forming tight junctions and homophilic/heterophilic interactions. This study aimed to analyze serum nectin‑2 and nectin‑4 levels in lung cancer patients and to evaluate the prognostic, diagnostic and predictive strengths. Data from 74 lung cancer patients were retrospectively examined and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were used to measure serum nectin‑2 and nectin‑4 concentrations. A total number of 40 age and sex-adjusted healthy controls were also enrolled in the study. The median serum nectin‑2 and nectin‑4 levels of the patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p < 0.001); however, neither biomarker was found to be associated with clinicopathological parameters, (p > 0.05), and furthermore they were found not to be correlated with either overall survival or progression-free survival (p > 0.05). Even though both markers showed high diagnostic values, serum nectin‑2 was found superior to both serum nectin‑4 and serum nectin-2 + nectin‑4 combinations in the diagnosis of lung cancer according to higher sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Serum nectin‑2 and nectin‑4 might be used in lung cancer diagnosis but the diagnostic importance of nectin‑2 is higher. The prognostic and predictive strengths in cancer are controversial. Furthermore, the interactions with tumor microenvironments and the potentials as therapeutic targets for malignancies have yet to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Cell Adhesion MoleculesLung NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentFemaleHumansMaleNectinsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCell Adhesion MoleculesNectinsCancerDiagnosisLungNectinsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31440821
OpenAlexW2969528358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.