Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440814›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect.

Nicolas Marty, Maxime Marty, Micha Pfeuty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A perceptual grouping model for auditory kappa effects.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas MartySorbonne University, 75000, Paris, France.
Maxime MartyUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA, UMR 5287, CNRS, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Micha PfeutyUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA, UMR 5287, CNRS, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux, France. micha.pfeuty@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-0458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitch height is known to interfere with temporal judgment. This is the case in the auditory kappa effect in which the relative degree of pitch distance separating two tones extends the perceived duration of the inter-onset interval (IOI). However, pitch variations which result from manipulations of the fundamental frequency of tones are associated with variations of the spectral centroid, which is related to the perceived brightness. The present study aimed at determining the relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect. Forty-eight participants performed an AXB paradigm (tone X was shifted to be closer to either tone A or B) in three conditions: the three tones varied in both pitch and brightness (PB condition), pitch varied but brightness was fixed (P condition) or brightness varied but pitch was fixed (B condition). Pitch and brightness were modified by manipulating the fundamental frequency (F0) and the spectral centroid of the tones, respectively. In each condition, the percentage of trials in which the first IOI was perceived as shorter increased as X was closer (in pitch and/or brightness) to A. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect was larger in PB than in P condition, while it did not differ between PB and B conditions, suggesting that brightness would contribute more than pitch height to the auditory kappa effect. This study provides the first evidence that auditory brightness interferes with duration judgment and highlights the importance to consider jointly the role of pitch height and brightness in future studies on auditory temporal processing.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultFemaleFranceHumansMalePitch DiscriminationSingingTime Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.