Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440726›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2019

Evaluation of antiseizure drug efficacy and tolerability in the rat lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model.

Cameron S Metcalf, Jennifer Huff, Kyle E Thomson, Kristina Johnson, Sharon F Edwards, Karen S Wilcox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Positive Allosteric Modulator ofThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cameron S MetcalfAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-0405
Jennifer HuffAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
Kyle E ThomsonAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
Kristina JohnsonAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
Sharon F EdwardsAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
Karen S WilcoxAnticonvulsant Drug Development Program, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model uses repeated administration of a low dose of lamotrigine during the kindling process to produce resistance to lamotrigine, which also extends to some other antiseizure drugs (ASDs). This model of pharmacoresistant epilepsy has been incorporated into the testing scheme utilized by the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP). Although some ASDs have been evaluated in this model, a comprehensive evaluation of ASD prototypes has not been reported.

methodsFollowing depth electrode implantation and recovery, rats were exposed to lamotrigine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to each stimulation during the kindling development process (~3 weeks). A test dose of lamotrigine was used to confirm that fully kindled rats were lamotrigine-resistant. Efficacy (unambiguous protection against electrically elicited convulsive seizures) was defined as a Racine score < 3 in the absence of overt compound-induced side effects. Various ASDs, comprising several mechanistic classes, were administered to fully kindled, lamotrigine-resistant rats. Where possible, multiple doses of each drug were administered in order to obtain median effective dose (ED

resultsFive sodium channel blockers tested (eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, phenytoin, and rufinamide) were either not efficacious or effective only at doses that were not well-tolerated in this model. In contrast, compounds targeting either GABA receptors (clobazam, clonazepam, phenobarbital) or GABA-uptake proteins (tiagabine) produced dose-dependent efficacy against convulsive seizures. Compounds acting to modulate Ca SIGNIFICANCE: These results strengthen the conclusion that the lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model demonstrates pharmacoresistance to certain ASDs, including, but not limited to, sodium channel blockers, and supports the utility of the model for helping to identify compounds with potential efficacy against pharmacoresistant seizures.

Indexed as

animal modelsantiseizure drugskindlingpharmacoresistant epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID31440726
PMCPMC6698678
OpenAlexW2965853835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.