Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440723›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2019

Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Katri Silvennoinen, Nikola de Lange, Sara Zagaglia, Simona Balestrini, Ganna Androsova, Merel Wassenaar, Pauls Auce, Andreja Avbersek, Felicitas Becker, Bianca Berghuis and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuropharmacology of Antiseizure Drugs.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure drugs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021
    Review
  16. Trait impulsivity in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Katri SilvennoinenDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-0029
Nikola de LangeLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine University of Luxembourg Belvaux Luxembourg.
Sara ZagagliaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Simona BalestriniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Ganna AndrosovaLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine University of Luxembourg Belvaux Luxembourg.
Merel WassenaarStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN) Heemstede The Netherlands.
Pauls AuceDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Andreja AvbersekDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Felicitas BeckerHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Bianca BerghuisStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN) Heemstede The Netherlands.
Ellen CampbellBelfast Health and Social Care Trust Belfast UK.
Antonietta CoppolaPediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health University of Genoa Genoa Italy.
Ben FrancisDepartment of Biostatistics University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Stefan WolkingHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Gianpiero L CavalleriMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-0506
John CraigBelfast Health and Social Care Trust Belfast UK.
Norman DelantyMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-9842
Michael R JohnsonFaculty of Medicine, Division of Brain Sciences Imperial College London UK.
Bobby P C KoelemanDepartment of Genetics University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.
Wolfram S KunzDepartment of Epileptology University of Bonn Bonn Germany.
Holger LercheHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Anthony G MarsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Terence J O'BrienDepartments of Neuroscience and Neurology, Central Clinical School Monash University, The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Josemir W SanderDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.
Graeme J SillsDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Pasquale StrianoPediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini Genova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-1476
Federico ZaraLaboratory of Neurogenetics and Neuroscience IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini Genova Italy.
Job van der PalenUniversity of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.
Roland KrauseLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine University of Luxembourg Belvaux Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-7126
Chantal DepondtDepartment of Neurology Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-5319
Sanjay M SisodiyaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-5893
EpiPGX Consortium
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Luxembourg · LUBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLFederico II University Hospital · ITImperial College London · GBThe Alfred Hospital · AUUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Department of Health 09/144/09Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1062Medical Research Council G0800637Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

methodsPeople with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12-month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females.

resultsWe included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08-1.13], SIGNIFICANCE: In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsseizurestolerabilityvalproate

Identifiers

PMID31440723
PMCPMC6698679
OpenAlexW2955063101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.