Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440522›Full record

ArticleHypoxia (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Separate and combined effects of hypobaric hypoxia and hindlimb suspension on skeletal homeostasis and hematopoiesis in mice.

Marjorie Durand, Jean-Marc Collombet, Sophie Frasca, Véronique Sarilar, Jean-Jacques Lataillade, Marie-Caroline Le Bousse-Kerdilès, Xavier Holy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypoxia (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impacts of Hypoxia on Osteoclast Formation and Activity: Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marjorie DurandDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex 91223, France.
Jean-Marc CollombetDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex 91223, France.
Sophie FrascaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex 91223, France.
Véronique SarilarDepartment of Platforms & Technological Research, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex, 91223, France.
Jean-Jacques Lataillade *Department of Medical and Surgical Assistance to the Armed Forces, French Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex 91223, France.
Marie-Caroline Le Bousse-Kerdilès *INSERM UMR-S/MD1197, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, Cedex 94807, France.
Xavier Holy *Department of Platforms & Technological Research, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, Cedex, 91223, France.
Service de Santé des Armées · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone marrow response to an organismal stress is made by orchestrating the interplay between hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Neither the cellular nor the molecular factors that regulate this process are fully understood, especially since this mechanism probably varies depending on the type of stress. Herein, we explored the differentiation and fate of MSCs and HSPCs in mice challenged with a hematopoietic stress or a mechanical stress applied separately or in combination.

methodsMice were subjected to 4 days of hypobaric hypoxia (hematopoietic challenge) and/or 7 days of hindlimb suspension (stromal challenge) and then sacrificed for blood and bone collection. Using hematological measurements, colony-forming unit assays, bone histomorphometry and array-based multiplex ELISA analysis, we evaluated challenge influences on both MSC and HSPC mobilization, differentiation (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and mature blood cells) and fate.

resultsWe found that hypoxia leads to HSPC mobilization and that an imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption accounts for this mobilization. Whilst suspension is also associated with an imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption, it does not induce HSPC mobilization. Then, we revealed cellular interactions by combining hematopoietic and stromal challenges together in mice. We showed that the hypoxia-driven HSPC mobilization is moderated by suspension. Moreover, when applied in a hypoxic environment, suspension offsets bone imbalance. We identified stroma cell-derived factors MIP-1α, HGF and SDF-1 as potent molecular key players sustaining interactions between hindlimb suspension and hypobaric hypoxia.

conclusionTaken together, our data highlight the benefit of combining different types of stress to better understand the interplay between MSCs and HSPCs.

Indexed as

hematopoietic stem and progenitor cellshindlimb suspensionhypobaric hypoxiamesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID31440522
PMCPMC6667353
OpenAlexW2963418647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.