Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2019

Models of Intracellular Transport: Pros and Cons.

Alexander A Mironov, Galina V Beznoussenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The 50-nm Free Vesicles Visible inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Nlp-dependent ER-to-Golgi transport.International journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Understanding the Golgi Apparatus and Intracellular Transport Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Intracellular Membrane Transport in Vascular Endothelial Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. COVID-19 Biogenesis and Intracellular Transport.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Diffusion Model of Intra-Golgi Transport Has Limited Power.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Effect of the First Feeding on Enterocytes of Newborn Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander A MironovDepartment of Cell Biology, The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Galina V BeznoussenkoDepartment of Cell Biology, The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular transport is one of the most confusing issues in the field of cell biology. Many different models and their combinations have been proposed to explain the experimental data on intracellular transport. Here, we analyse the data related to the mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi and intra-Golgi transport from the point of view of the main models of intracellular transport; namely: the vesicular model, the diffusion model, the compartment maturation-progression model, and the kiss-and-run model. This review initially describes our current understanding of Golgi function, while highlighting the recent progress that has been made. It then continues to discuss the outstanding questions and potential avenues for future research with regard to the models of these transport steps. To compare the power of these models, we have applied the method proposed by K. Popper; namely, the formulation of prohibitive observations according to, and the consecutive evaluation of, previous data, on the basis on the new models. The levels to which the different models can explain the experimental observations are different, and to date, the most powerful has been the kiss-and-run model, whereas the least powerful has been the diffusion model.

Indexed as

COPICOPIIER-Golgi transportGolgi complexintracellular transport

Identifiers

PMID31440506
PMCPMC6693330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.