ArticleAllergo journal international2018
Comparison of sublingual immunotherapy and oral immunotherapy in peanut allergy.
Article in Allergo journal international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sublingual Immunotherapy for Food Allergy: Updates in Safety, Efficacy, and Future Considerations.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- A novel oral immunotherapy strategy using transgenic barley inducesFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Decoding Early Clues: Immune Mechanisms, Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of IgE-Mediated Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy in Children.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Preclinical evaluation of alternatives to oral immunotherapy for food allergies.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
- Formulation andSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Treatment Approaches to Food Allergy.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Review
- Exercise induced anaphylaxis in kiwi allergic patient: case report.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Food Allergy from Infancy Through Adulthood.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020Review
- [Research advances in influencing factors for immune tolerance to food allergens in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019Review
- The use of inhibition assay in Api g 7 suspected allergy in a female patient with anaphylaxis: A case report.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy has been increasing over the past few decades at an alarming rate with peanut allergy affecting about 2% of children. Both oral immunotherapy (OIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have shown promise as a treatment option for peanut allergy. Immunotherapy induces desensitization and reduces the risk of reaction during accidental ingestion and may also enable those who are successfully desensitized to include the food allergen in their diet. OIT has been very well studied and has been found to be more efficacious that SLIT with an acceptable safety profile. However, SLIT is associated with fewer side effects. Studies indicate that a combination of SLIT and OIT may together induce a significant increase in challenge thresholds with fewer adverse events. More head-to-head clinical trials that direct compare OIT and SLIT as well as SLIT and OIT combination studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.