ArticlePeerJ2019
Group B
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus exacerbates vaginal group BmSphere · 2026Article
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus exacerbates vaginal group BbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative Characterization of Vaginal and Gut Microbiota in Late-Pregnancy Women with or Without Group B Streptococcus Colonization.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Re-framing the importance of Group BInfection and immunity · 2024Review
- Vaginal microbial dynamics and pathogen colonization in a humanized microbiota mouse model.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Interspecies Interactions within the Host: the Social Network of Group BInfection and immunity · 2023Review
- Alterations of the vaginal microbiome in healthy pregnant women positive for group B Streptococcus colonization during the third trimester.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Association of Gut Microbiota Composition in Pregnant Women Colonized with Group BPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gardnerella vaginalis promotes group B Streptococcus vaginal colonization, enabling ascending uteroplacental infection in pregnant mice.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Bacterial and Host Determinants of Group B Streptococcal Vaginal Colonization and Ascending Infection in Pregnancy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have indicated that variations in the vaginal microbiome result in symptomatic conditions. Group B
methodsA total of 22 GBS-positive, non-pregnant women and 44 matched GBS-negative women were recruited for the current study. The composition of the vaginal microbiome was profiled by sequencing the 16S rRNA genes. The microbiome diversity and variation were then evaluated.
resultsThe vaginal microbiome of the 66 subjects enrolled in the current study were compared and the results showed that GBS-positive women exhibited significant vaginal microbial differences compared with the GBS-negative women based on the analysis of similarities ( DISCUSSION: The current study addressed significant variations across the communities of the vaginal microbiome in GBS-positive and GBS-negative women in a Chinese cohort, which paves the way for a larger cohort-based clinical validation study and the development of therapeutic probiotics in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.