ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2019
What is the best treatment strategy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax? A retrospective study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Open Thoracotomy vs. Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2023Article
- Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax following bullectomy with pleurodesis or pleurectomy: A retrospective analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral treatment strategies are available for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Surgical procedures are also performed in patients with PSP without an absolute indication for surgery. This study was performed to investigate the best treatment strategy for PSP by comparison of the recurrence rate. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom January 2006 to December 2013, 149 patients with PSP aged ≤50 years were treated in our institution. We reviewed the recurrence rate of PSP for each treatment strategy and evaluated the association between the recurrence rate of PSP with the clinicopathological characteristics. We also compared the surgery and non-surgery groups.
resultsA significant difference in the PSP recurrence rate was found between the surgery and non-surgery groups (22% vs. 52%, respectively; p < 0.001), patients aged ≥22 and < 22 years (16% vs. 44%, respectively; p < 0.001), and smokers and nonsmokers (13% vs. 43%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001, p = 0.050, and p = 0.001, respectively). In the surgery group, the PSP recurrence rate was significantly different between patients aged ≥22 and < 22 years (7% vs. 38%, respectively; p < 0.001) and smokers and nonsmokers (5% vs. 33%, respectively; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in the non-surgery group.
conclusionsIn the surgical treatment of PSP, it is desirable that smokers stop using tobacco and that patients are ≥22 years old. Moreover, when surgery is being considered, the best timing seems to be when air leakage is present because the air leakage sites can be resected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.