Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440238›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

A Phase Ib Study of the Combination of Personalized Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccine, Aspirin, and Standard of Care Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Nivolumab for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-A Proof of Antigen Discovery Feasibility in Three Patients.

Michal Bassani-Sternberg, Antonia Digklia, Florian Huber, Dorothea Wagner, Christine Sempoux, Brian J Stevenson, Anne-Christine Thierry, Justine Michaux, HuiSong Pak, Julien Racle and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michal Bassani-SternbergLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Antonia DigkliaDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Florian HuberLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dorothea WagnerDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christine SempouxInstitute of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Brian J StevensonSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anne-Christine ThierryDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Justine MichauxLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
HuiSong PakLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julien RacleLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline BoudousquieDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Klara BalintLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
George CoukosLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David GfellerLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvia Martin LluesmaLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alexandre HarariLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lana E KandalaftLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHLudwig Cancer Research · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the promising therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), most patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy do not achieve objective responses, with most tumor regressions being partial rather than complete. It is hypothesized that the absence of pre-existing antitumor immunity and/or the presence of additional tumor immune suppressive factors at the tumor microenvironment are responsible for such therapeutic failures. It is therefore clear that in order to fully exploit the potential of PD-1 blockade therapy, antitumor immune response should be amplified, while tumor immune suppression should be further attenuated. Cancer vaccines may prime patients for treatments with ICB by inducing effective anti-tumor immunity, especially in patients lacking tumor-infiltrating T-cells. These "non-inflamed" non-permissive tumors that are resistant to ICB could be rendered sensitive and transformed into "inflamed" tumor by vaccination. In this article we describe a clinical study where we use pancreatic cancer as a model, and we hypothesize that effective vaccination in pancreatic cancer patients, along with interventions that can reprogram important immunosuppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment, can enhance tumor immune recognition, thus enhancing response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We incorporate into the schedule of standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy adjuvant setting a vaccine platform comprised of autologous dendritic cells loaded with personalized neoantigen peptides (PEP-DC) identified through our own proteo-genomics antigen discovery pipeline. Furthermore, we add nivolumab, an antibody against PD-1, to boost and maintain the vaccine's effect. We also demonstrate the feasibility of identifying personalized neoantigens in three pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, and we describe their optimal incorporation into long peptides for manufacturing into vaccine products. We finally discuss the advantages as well as the scientific and logistic challenges of such an exploratory vaccine clinical trial, and we highlight its novelty.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantMolecular Targeted TherapyAmino Acid SequenceAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAspirinCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsExomeFeasibility StudiesHumansImmunotherapy, ActiveNeoplasm ProteinsNivolumabPancreatic NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAspirinNeoplasm ProteinsNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanPeptidesProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorantigen discoverycancer immunotherapydendritic cell vaccineneoantigenpancreatic adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31440238
PMCPMC6694698
OpenAlexW2963698421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.