Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31440172›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Biophysical Psychiatry-How Computational Neuroscience Can Help to Understand the Complex Mechanisms of Mental Disorders.

Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen, Tobias Kaufmann, Torbjørn Elvsåshagen, Anna Devor, Srdjan Djurovic, Lars T Westlye, Marja-Leena Linne, Marcella Rietschel, Dirk Schubert, Stefan Borgwardt and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Tuomo Mäki-MarttunenDepartment of Computational Physiology, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.
Tobias KaufmannNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjørn ElvsåshagenNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anna DevorDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Srdjan DjurovicDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars T WestlyeNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marja-Leena LinneFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Marcella RietschelDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Dirk SchubertCognitive Neuroscience Department, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Magdalena Efrim-BudisteanuProf. Dr. Alex. Obregia Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry, Bucharest, Romania.
Francesco BettellaNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir HalnesFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Espen HagenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig NæssDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjørn V NessFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Torgeir MobergetNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christoph MetznerCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Andrew G EdwardsDepartment of Computational Physiology, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne FyhnDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anders M DaleDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Gaute T EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Ole A AndreassenNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

MICROSCOPIC FOUNDATION OF MULTIMODAL HUMAN IMAGINGR01MH111359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALE, ANDERS M, DEVOR, ANNA · 2016 to 2020
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is the most complex of human organs, and the pathophysiology underlying abnormal brain function in psychiatric disorders is largely unknown. Despite the rapid development of diagnostic tools and treatments in most areas of medicine, our understanding of mental disorders and their treatment has made limited progress during the last decades. While recent advances in genetics and neuroscience have a large potential, the complexity and multidimensionality of the brain processes hinder the discovery of disease mechanisms that would link genetic findings to clinical symptoms and behavior. This applies also to schizophrenia, for which genome-wide association studies have identified a large number of genetic risk loci, spanning hundreds of genes with diverse functionalities. Importantly, the multitude of the associated variants and their prevalence in the healthy population limit the potential of a reductionist functional genetics approach as a stand-alone solution to discover the disease pathology. In this review, we outline the key concepts of a "biophysical psychiatry," an approach that employs large-scale mechanistic, biophysics-founded computational modelling to increase transdisciplinary understanding of the pathophysiology and strive toward robust predictions. We discuss recent scientific advances that allow a synthesis of previously disparate fields of psychiatry, neurophysiology, functional genomics, and computational modelling to tackle open questions regarding the pathophysiology of heritable mental disorders. We argue that the complexity of the increasing amount of genetic data exceeds the capabilities of classical experimental assays and requires computational approaches. Biophysical psychiatry, based on modelling diseased brain networks using existing and future knowledge of basic genetic, biochemical, and functional properties on a single neuron to a microcircuit level, may allow a leap forward in deriving interpretable biomarkers and move the field toward novel treatment options.

Indexed as

computational modellinggenome-wide association studyion channelspsychotic disordersschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31440172
PMCPMC6691488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.