ArticleVeterinary world2019
Antibacterial efficacy of
Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Normal and Ozone StressedFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Multifaceted role of Moringa oleifera leaf extract as antimicrobial, growth enhancer and mitigator of salt stress in tomato seedlings.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- In vitro antibacterial activity of Moringa oleifera leaf and seed extracts against antibiotic-resistant bacteria and clinical isolates.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Detection of Mycobacteria in Arabian camels and antimycobacterial potential of Moringa oleifera.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation ofCurrent drug delivery · 2025Article
- Medicinal utilization and nutritional properties of drumstick (Food science & nutrition · 2024Review
- Review
- The Impact ofNutrients · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Antidiabetic Effect of Combined Leaf and Seed Extracts ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Drumstick (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbscess in camel is one of the most important bacterial infections. It causes anemia and emaciation, resulting in an economic loss due to carcass condemnation and a decrease in reproductive and production efficiency.
aimThis investigation aimed to isolate the bacteria from abscesses in camels and evaluate the antibacterial activity of MATERIALS AND
methodsDisk diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration were used for the evaluation of the antibacterial activity of
resultsThe isolated bacteria were displayed relatively as follows:
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.