Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31439628›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Automatic Spinal Cord Gray Matter Quantification: A Novel Approach.

C Tsagkas, A Horvath, A Altermatt, S Pezold, M Weigel, T Haas, M Amann, L Kappos, T Sprenger, O Bieri and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biological variation in cervical spinal cord MRI morphometry in healthy individuals and people with multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C TsagkasFrom the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (C.T., M.A., L.K., T.S., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-6316
A HorvathDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (A.H., A.A., S.P., M.W., O.B., P.C.), University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-7049
A AltermattTranslational Imaging in Neurology Basel (C.T., A.A., M.A., M.W., L.K., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-0758
S PezoldDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (A.H., A.A., S.P., M.W., O.B., P.C.), University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4998-8983
M WeigelTranslational Imaging in Neurology Basel (C.T., A.A., M.A., M.W., L.K., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-1414
T HaasDivision of Radiological Physics (M.W., T.H., O.B.), Department of Radiology.ORCID 0000-0003-3287-3378
M AmannFrom the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (C.T., M.A., L.K., T.S., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0001-8041-4083
L KapposFrom the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (C.T., M.A., L.K., T.S., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5509
T SprengerFrom the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (C.T., M.A., L.K., T.S., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering.ORCID 0000-0002-5390-819X
O BieriDivision of Radiological Physics (M.W., T.H., O.B.), Department of Radiology.ORCID 0000-0002-6755-5495
P CattinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (A.H., A.A., S.P., M.W., O.B., P.C.), University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8785-2713
K ParmarFrom the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (C.T., M.A., L.K., T.S., K.P.), Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering katrin.parmar@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-6238
MACOM (United States) · USUniversity of Basel · CHDeutsche Klinik für Diagnostik · DEUniversity Radiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCurrently, accurate and reproducible spinal cord GM segmentation remains challenging and a noninvasive broadly accepted reference standard for spinal cord GM measurements is still a matter of ongoing discussion. Our aim was to assess the reproducibility and accuracy of cervical spinal cord GM and WM cross-sectional area measurements using averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions images and a fully-automatic postprocessing segmentation algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe cervical spinal cord of 24 healthy subjects (14 women; mean age, 40 ± 11 years) was scanned in a test-retest fashion on a 3T MR imaging system. Twelve axial averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions slices were acquired over a 48-mm cord segment. GM and WM were both manually segmented by 2 experienced readers and compared with an automatic variational segmentation algorithm with a shape prior modified for 3D data with a slice similarity prior. Precision and accuracy of the automatic method were evaluated using coefficients of variation and Dice similarity coefficients.

resultsThe mean GM area was 17.20 ± 2.28 mm

conclusionsOur novel approach including the averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions sequence and a fully-automated postprocessing segmentation algorithm demonstrated an accurate and reproducible spinal cord GM and WM segmentation. This pipeline is promising for both the exploration of longitudinal structural GM changes and application in clinical settings in disorders affecting the spinal cord.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultFemaleGray MatterHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID31439628
PMCPMC7048435
OpenAlexW2969292425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.