Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31439603›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Comparison of photoselective green light laser vaporisation versus traditional transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective studies.

Shicong Lai, Panxin Peng, Tongxiang Diao, Huimin Hou, Xuan Wang, Wei Zhang, Ming Liu, Yaoguang Zhang, Samuel Seery, Jianye Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shicong Lai *Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Panxin Peng *Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Tongxiang DiaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Huimin HouDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Xuan WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Ming Liu *Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China wangjy@bjhmoh.cn liuming3222@bjhmoh.cn.
Yaoguang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Samuel SeerySchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-1076
Jianye Wang *Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China wangjy@bjhmoh.cn liuming3222@bjhmoh.cn.
Beijing Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of green-light laser photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library until October 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and prospective studies comparing the safety and efficacy of PVP versus TURP for LUTS manifesting through BPH. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Perioperative parameters, complications rates and functional outcomes including treatment-related adverse events such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), quality of life (QoL) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).

results22 publications consisting of 2665 patients were analysed. Pooled analysis revealed PVP is associated with reduced blood loss, transfusion, clot retention, TUR syndrome, capsular perforation, catheterisation time and hospitalisation, but also with a higher reintervention rate and longer intervention duration (all p<0.05). No significant difference in IPSS, Qmax, QoL, PVR or IIEF at 3, 24, 36 or 60 months was identified. There was a significant difference in QoL at 6 months (MD=-0.08; 95% CI -0.13 to -0.02; p=0.007), and IPSS (MD = -0.10; 95% CI -0.15 to -0.05; p<0.0001) and Qmax (MD=0.62; 95% CI 0.06 to 1.19; p=0.03) at 12 months, although these differences were not clinically relevant.

conclusionPVP is an effective alternative, holding additional safety benefits. PVP has equivalent long-term IPSS, Qmax, QoL, PVR, IIEF efficacy and fewer complications. The main drawbacks are dysuria and reintervention, although both can be managed with non-invasive techniques. The additional shortcoming is that PVP does not acquire histological tissue examination which removes an opportunity to identify prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyTransurethral Resection of ProstateColorErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleProstatic HyperplasiaProstatismQuality of Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)meta-analysisphotoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP)transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)

Identifiers

PMID31439603
PMCPMC6707662
OpenAlexW2969713978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.