Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31439585›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Transforming the Early Drug Development Paradigm at the National Cancer Institute: The Formation of NCI's Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN).

Holly A Massett, Grace Mishkin, Jeffrey A Moscow, Amy Gravell, Michael Steketee, Martha Kruhm, Sae H Han, Barbara Barry, Michael Montello, James Zwiebel and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recognizing NIH's Role in Turning Discoveries into Cancer Treatments.LES nouvelles. Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Holly A MassettNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. massetth@mail.nih.gov.
Grace MishkinNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeffrey A MoscowNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Amy GravellThe Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland.
Michael SteketeeWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Martha KruhmNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sae H HanNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Barbara BarryUser-Centered Design Inc., Ashburn, Virginia.
Michael MontelloNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
James ZwiebelNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeffrey S AbramsNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
James H DoroshowNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
S Percy IvyNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early drug development for cancer requires broad collaboration and skilled clinical investigators to enable enrollment of patients whose tumors have defined molecular profiles. To respond to these challenges, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) transformed its 60-year-old early-phase drug development program in 2014 into the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). The ETCTN is a consolidated, national network of 40+ academic institutions responsible for conducting more than 100 early-phase clinical trials. It promotes team science coordinated among basic, translational, and clinical investigators, emphasizing the inclusion of early career trialists. This perspective provides a brief overview of the ETCTN, summarizes its successes and challenges over its first grant funding cycle, and discusses the program's future directions. Measures indicated strong connectivity across the institutions, significant increases in investigator approval of the ETCTN scientific portfolio from years 1 to 4, and substantial research activity over 5 years, with 334 letters of intent submitted, 102 trials activated, and 3,570 patients accrued. The ETCTN's successful adoption relied heavily on the inclusion of senior investigators who have long-standing interactions with the NCI and a willingness to participate in a team science approach and to mentor early career investigators. In addition, NCI invested substantial resources in a centralized infrastructure to conduct trials and to support the inclusion of biomarkers in its studies. The ETCTN provides evidence that a collaborative national clinical trial network for early drug development is feasible and can address the demands of precision medicine approaches to oncologic clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug DevelopmentAntineoplastic AgentsFinancing, OrganizedHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsProgram DevelopmentResearch PersonnelResearch Support as TopicUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31439585
PMCPMC6891162
OpenAlexW2969830883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.